Re: Sun's StarOffice 5.1, again

1999-09-21 Thread Carl Makin
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Greg Lewis wrote: > > Actually, there is one other option, I used it. Compile a single CPU kernel, > > install StarOffice , then compile you SMP kernel and use StarOffice... > Ahh, so it only tries the forking during install then. I wasn't aware of Doesn't work for me. I

Re: Sun's StarOffice 5.1, again

1999-09-20 Thread Greg Lewis
> Well folks... > > I've followed http://www.serv.net/~mcglk/staroffice-install.html to the > letter but can't get StarOffice to run on my 3.3-STABLE box. The newest > error I'm getting comes after the install has completed. Actually, I > think it may have appeared just before completion, but I

Re: Sun's StarOffice 5.1, again

1999-09-20 Thread Matt Behrens
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Chad R. Larson wrote: : Anybody sign up for doing the Native FreeBSD port whenever Sun gets : around to releasing the sources? Sadly, I'm not much of a hacker, but if you need someone to test, I'm your man! :-) I use StarOffice daily on RH6 and am fairly familiar with it no

Re: Sun's StarOffice 5.1, again

1999-09-20 Thread Matt Behrens
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Mike Holling wrote: : until I went back and made a kernel with the POSIX options mentioned on : the web page. StarOffice seems to hang on some Word docs, but I'm : assuming this has nothing to do with FreeBSD. It doesn't. I use StarOffice on RH6 at work and I have a stack

Re: Sun's StarOffice 5.1, again

1999-09-20 Thread Kip Macy
With their ever-stricter licensing agreements and their ever-less competitive position in the market, it is likely to be some time before the source is released under a usable license. -Kip On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Chad R. Larson wrote: > As I recall, Mike Smith wrot