Re: Trouble with 4.3-RELEASE compiler

2001-04-28 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 09:38:02AM +0200, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On Sat, 28 Apr 2001 01:27:33 +0200 > "Dimitry Andric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > DA> Squid with gcc 2.95.2 and optimization (both -O, -O2 and -O666), and > DA> I can assure you it bombed out with inexplicable null pointer >

Re: Trouble with 4.3-RELEASE compiler

2001-04-28 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 06:08:34PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 08:38:30PM -0400, User Witr wrote: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > :-As far as I know FreeBSD doesn't support nor recommened compiling > > :-things (especially large mission critical programs) with anythi

Re: Trouble with 4.3-RELEASE compiler

2001-04-28 Thread Bert Driehuis
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Donn Miller wrote: >If > you want to make a program run faster, you've got to write implement > better algorithms, and its as simple as that. Beyond that, you'll just > have to get faster HW. This in general is tru

Re: Trouble with 4.3-RELEASE compiler

2001-04-28 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001 06:10:00 -0400 Donn Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: DM> Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: DM> > It makes me wonder just how safe -O is :( DM> DM> I think Window Maker compiles parts of its code with -O0. Must be for DM> good reason. I think the only time you're going to s