Re: Trying NT Hacks

2001-12-30 Thread Greg Black
"Chad R. Larson" wrote: | This is a place where we UNIX users might be able to do the rest of | the world a service. Maybe, but THIS place is FreeBSD-stable and this is NOT the place to continue this thread. Take it where it belongs, please. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: Trying NT Hacks

2001-12-27 Thread Greg Black
This thread has nothing to do with stable -- take it to chat, or just drop it. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

Re: Trying NT Hacks

2001-12-27 Thread jacks
Peter Ong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 6:57 PM >Subject: Re: Trying NT Hacks > > >> On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 06:39:58PM -0800, Peter Ong wrote: >> > I don't know what it is with some people. I po

Re: Trying NT Hacks

2001-12-27 Thread Sam Drinkard
One thing that works for me is the portsentry. It's pretty simple, but blocks portscans on a large number of ports, can be configured for tcp or udp., etc.. I have noticed an increase in port 111 and 119 attempts since I started posting here.. mostly random people, and I do frequent lookups. If

Re: Trying NT Hacks

2001-12-27 Thread Kutulu
From: "Peter Ong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 7:02 PM Subject: Re: Trying NT Hacks > Really... I just wonder how they figure out the IPs, other than randomly > guessing. Someone did mention that, and I guess there really aren't that