On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 10:08:30PM +0300, Vlad GALU wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Robert Watson wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >>
> I'll see whether the system still locks up or no
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Robert Watson wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>>
I'll see whether the system still locks up or not though..
>>>
>>> Okay, I'm bringing rwatson@ into the thread since this
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Robert Watson wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I'll see whether the system still locks up or not though..
Okay, I'm bringing rwatson@ into the thread since this is specific to UDP.
I've now fixed the bug leading to the lock order reversal; I'd be i
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I'll see whether the system still locks up or not though..
Okay, I'm bringing rwatson@ into the thread since this is specific to UDP.
I've now fixed the bug leading to the lock order reversal; I'd be interested
in knowing if it also corrects th
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I'll see whether the system still locks up or not though..
Okay, I'm bringing rwatson@ into the thread since this is specific to UDP.
Crumbs. It looks like the tunable fetch got dropped into the wrong function
of udp_inpcb_init() and udp_init()
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 06:24:59PM +0300, Vlad GALU wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 06:11:25PM +0300, Vlad GALU wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > At 08:40 AM 10/
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 06:11:25PM +0300, Vlad GALU wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > At 08:40 AM 10/10/2008, Vlad GALU wrote:
>> >>
>> >> As my kernel had started to
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 06:11:25PM +0300, Vlad GALU wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > At 08:40 AM 10/10/2008, Vlad GALU wrote:
> >>
> >> As my kernel had started to lock up periodically and I don't have
> >> hands-on access to that machine, I ena
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 08:40 AM 10/10/2008, Vlad GALU wrote:
>>
>> As my kernel had started to lock up periodically and I don't have
>> hands-on access to that machine, I enabled WITNESS.
>> So these started to pop up:
>
> Is this with a stock
At 08:40 AM 10/10/2008, Vlad GALU wrote:
As my kernel had started to lock up periodically and I don't have
hands-on access to that machine, I enabled WITNESS.
So these started to pop up:
Is this with a stock kernel and sysctl settings ? Or do you have any
custom kernel options ?
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 03:40:26PM +0300, Vlad GALU wrote:
>>As my kernel had started to lock up periodically and I don't have
>> hands-on access to that machine, I enabled WITNESS.
>> So these started to pop up:
>>
>
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 03:40:26PM +0300, Vlad GALU wrote:
>As my kernel had started to lock up periodically and I don't have
> hands-on access to that machine, I enabled WITNESS.
> So these started to pop up:
>
> -- cut here --
> --- syscall (97, FreeBSD ELF64, socket), rip = 0x80070427c, rsp
As my kernel had started to lock up periodically and I don't have
hands-on access to that machine, I enabled WITNESS.
So these started to pop up:
-- cut here --
--- syscall (97, FreeBSD ELF64, socket), rip = 0x80070427c, rsp =
0x7fffe8c8, rbp = 0x516348 ---
uma_zalloc_arg: zone "16" with th
13 matches
Mail list logo
