> Kind of a large patch, but in order to make an omlette, you need to
> break a few servers.
>
> This is a diff against -CURRENT, not stable-8 as I didn't get a chance
> to test it. It is directly based off of changes that peter@ made to the
> Yahoo FreeBSD 7 tree.
>
> I have compile and boot te
> Kind of a large patch, but in order to make an omlette, you need to
> break a few servers.
>
> This is a diff against -CURRENT, not stable-8 as I didn't get a chance
> to test it. It is directly based off of changes that peter@ made to the
> Yahoo FreeBSD 7 tree.
>
> I have compile and boot t
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 17:51 -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Hi, Mahlon--
>
> On Jul 22, 2010, at 5:36 PM, Mahlon E. Smith wrote:
> > Install worked great, though it appears I need to keep hyperthreading
> > ("logical processors" bios option) disabled for it to boot reliably.
> > Similar errors as bef
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 17:51 -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Hi, Mahlon--
>
> On Jul 22, 2010, at 5:36 PM, Mahlon E. Smith wrote:
> > Install worked great, though it appears I need to keep hyperthreading
> > ("logical processors" bios option) disabled for it to boot reliably.
> > Similar errors as bef
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 17:51 -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Hi, Mahlon--
>
> On Jul 22, 2010, at 5:36 PM, Mahlon E. Smith wrote:
> > Install worked great, though it appears I need to keep hyperthreading
> > ("logical processors" bios option) disabled for it to boot reliably.
> > Similar errors as bef
Hi, Mahlon--
On Jul 22, 2010, at 5:36 PM, Mahlon E. Smith wrote:
> Install worked great, though it appears I need to keep hyperthreading
> ("logical processors" bios option) disabled for it to boot reliably.
> Similar errors as before if I enable it.
I believe FreeBSD ships with MAXCPU set to 32
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 05:36:11PM -0700, Mahlon E. Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010, Sean Bruno wrote:
> >
> > Funny you should mention this box. I've been arm wrestling with this
> > beastie for a couple of weeks and finally had some amount of success
> > today.
> >
> > A couple of things:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010, Sean Bruno wrote:
>
> Funny you should mention this box. I've been arm wrestling with this
> beastie for a couple of weeks and finally had some amount of success
> today.
>
> A couple of things:
>
> 1. Reduce your RAM to 64G (seriously)
> 2. Don't use the H200 Dell RAID
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010, Mahlon E. Smith wrote:
>
> [...]
> I suppose I could boot via console and log it all... come to think of
> it, I'll go give that a try to get more comprehensive output
Okay, here we go, output below my sig.
"panic: Built bad topology" -- oh, dear. That's a new one for me.
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 14:38 -0700, Mahlon E. Smith wrote:
> Picked up a couple of these powerhouse machines to be VirtualBox hosts.
> 24 core, 96G of RAM. Trying to put (amd64) both 8.0-RELEASE and 8.1-RC2
> on it with no luck whatsoever so far. Any help provided would be greatly
> appreciated, I'
Picked up a couple of these powerhouse machines to be VirtualBox hosts.
24 core, 96G of RAM. Trying to put (amd64) both 8.0-RELEASE and 8.1-RC2
on it with no luck whatsoever so far. Any help provided would be greatly
appreciated, I'm chomping at the bit pretty hard to put this hardware to
use, an
11 matches
Mail list logo
