On May 14 at 11:16, JJ Behrens spoke:
i've always started X with -bpp 24 in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xdm/Xservers to
get the correct depth for xdm. it's not taken from XF86Config, iirc.
Hmm:
# From XF86Config
Section Screen
DefaultDepth 16 # -
has always worked for me. Am I
On May 15 at 02:59, Aidan Skinner spoke:
Yeah. I tried it with startx -- -depth 24, which fixed the 16 colours
problem (thanks!).
I had thought about that, but changing my XF86Config to *only* have
24bpp @ 1024x786 didn't seem to make a difference. I would have
thought this would have
I had thought about that, but changing my XF86Config to *only* have
24bpp @ 1024x786 didn't seem to make a difference. I would have
thought this would have meant it actually ran at 24bpp. ;)
Interesting, because thts exactly what I do and it works for me. I
never had a problem with colour
probably
missed some discussion on the topic. Anyway, what is going on with Xfree86
v4.2 ? I once had seen XFree86 4.2 on freshports.org but then it came back
to 4.1 few days later...
NetBSD has already 4.2 in -stable so why not FreeBSD ?
The port was at 4.2.0 shortly before
2002 04:03 am, Herve Quiroz wrote:
I have not been member of this list until recently so I have probably
missed some discussion on the topic. Anyway, what is going on with Xfree86
v4.2 ? I once had seen XFree86 4.2 on freshports.org but then it came back
to 4.1 few days later
On Tuesday 05 March 2002 05:00 pm, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 16:25:26 -0500
From: stan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the 4.2 port appeared and disappeared from the tree, but is still
available and works fine.
(If you don't know what a meta-port is, look at
Must be a positive side to this, right? Otherwise you could just install
all of it with a trivial shell loop over the various appropriate
directories in the ports tree.
Will fix things like stale dependencies on imake or xf86libs-4
--
David W. Chapman Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Raintree
, what is going on with
Xfree86 v4.2 ? I once had seen XFree86 4.2 on freshports.org but then
it came back to 4.1 few days later...
NetBSD has already 4.2 in -stable so why not FreeBSD ?
The port was at 4.2.0 shortly before the release of FreeBSD 4.5 and
it was rolled back to 4.1.9
