On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:56:47 -0600, Hiroki Sato wrote:
This is an expected behavior. ACCEPT_RTADV is disabled by default on
9.X.
Thanks for clarifying. I'll make sure I update our documentation at work
regarding how exactly to get ACCEPT_RTADV working so this is clarified.
Regards,
Mark Felder wrote
in :
fe> On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:02:24 -0600, Hiroki Sato
fe> wrote:
fe>
fe> > re0 seems to have ACCEPT_RTADV. What is the problem?
fe>
fe> That's because I haven't rebooted
fe>
fe> Let's start fresh.
fe>
fe> The normal ipv6 configuration anyone would use:
fe>
fe> -ipv6_a
On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:02:24 -0600, Hiroki Sato wrote:
re0 seems to have ACCEPT_RTADV. What is the problem?
That's because I haven't rebooted
Let's start fresh.
The normal ipv6 configuration anyone would use:
-ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="YES" in rc.conf
-NO mention of net.inet6.ip6
Mark Felder wrote
in :
fe> On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 14:23:46 -0600, Hiroki Sato
fe> wrote:
fe>
fe> > It is an unexpected behavior and the flag should be set on all
fe> > interfaces. Can you send me your /etc/rc.conf, /etc/sysctl.conf, and
fe> > the result of "ifconfig -a"?
fe>
fe> Back at work
On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 14:23:46 -0600, Hiroki Sato wrote:
It is an unexpected behavior and the flag should be set on all
interfaces. Can you send me your /etc/rc.conf, /etc/sysctl.conf, and
the result of "ifconfig -a"?
Back at work so I have access to the machine again:
rc.conf:
hostname="
Mark Felder wrote
in <891fe25c-1560-479f-b855-1713c1c7a...@email.android.com>:
fe> Hiroki Sato wrote:
fe> >
fe> > Is it correct that ACCEPT_RTADV option was enabled on the vboxnet0
fe> > and not on re0, even after setting net.inet6.ip6.accept_rtadv to 1 at
fe> > boot time and ipv6_activate_all
Hiroki Sato wrote:
>
> Is it correct that ACCEPT_RTADV option was enabled on the vboxnet0
> and not on re0, even after setting net.inet6.ip6.accept_rtadv to 1 at
> boot time and ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="YES"?
>
>-- Hiroki
Yes, that is the behavior I witnessed.
_
Mark Felder wrote
in :
fe> I figured I would end up putting that in rc.conf as a temporary fix,
fe> but maybe that's just the long term solution. It seems so odd to me
fe> that the sysctl change doesn't automatically cause the ACCEPT_RTADV
fe> option to show up for re0, but it does for vboxnet0
Looping in hrs@ because he's the author of those changes.
On 01/06/2012 11:35, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:49:45 -0600, Sergey Kandaurov
> wrote:
>
>>
>> You mean ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="YES" ?
>>
> Yes... Unfortunately that's what I get for typing it manually and being
> d
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:49:45 -0600, Sergey Kandaurov
wrote:
You mean ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="YES" ?
Yes... Unfortunately that's what I get for typing it manually and being
distracted at the time. :-)
What is in your rc.conf? Do you have "inet6 accept_rtadv" keyword in it?
IIRC it
On 6 January 2012 22:19, Mark Felder wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
Hi,
> I upgraded my desktop at work just around christmas to 9-PRERELEASE builds
> and ipv6 has been broken since then. I've been too busy at work to fix it
> but today I finally had the chance to figure it out.
>
> Currently I'm running:
Hi guys,
I upgraded my desktop at work just around christmas to 9-PRERELEASE builds
and ipv6 has been broken since then. I've been too busy at work to fix it
but today I finally had the chance to figure it out.
Currently I'm running:
12:11:15 tech304:~ > uname -a
FreeBSD tech304.office.sup
12 matches
Mail list logo
