Alexey Popov wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
what is your RAID controller configuration (read ahead/cache/write
policy)? I have seen weird/bogus numbers (~100% busy) reported by
systat -v when read ahead was enabled on LSI/amr controllers.
I tried to run with disabled Read-ahead, but it didn't hel
Kris Kennaway wrote:
what is your RAID controller configuration (read ahead/cache/write
policy)? I have seen weird/bogus numbers (~100% busy) reported by
systat -v when read ahead was enabled on LSI/amr controllers.
I tried to run with disabled Read-ahead, but it didn't help.
I just ran into th
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Alexey Popov wrote:
Hi.
Panagiotis Christias wrote:
In the "good" case you are getting a much higher interrupt rate but
with the data you provided I can't tell where from. You need to run
vmstat -i at regular intervals (e.g. every 10 seconds for a minute)
during the "good
Alexey Popov wrote:
Hi.
Panagiotis Christias wrote:
In the "good" case you are getting a much higher interrupt rate but
with the data you provided I can't tell where from. You need to run
vmstat -i at regular intervals (e.g. every 10 seconds for a minute)
during the "good" and "bad" times, sin
Hi.
Panagiotis Christias wrote:
In the "good" case you are getting a much higher interrupt rate but
with the data you provided I can't tell where from. You need to run
vmstat -i at regular intervals (e.g. every 10 seconds for a minute)
during the "good" and "bad" times, since it only provides c
On Nov 11, 2007 7:26 PM, Alexey Popov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >>> In the "good" case you are getting a much higher interrupt rate but
> >>> with the data you provided I can't tell where from. You need to run
> >>> vmstat -i at regular intervals (e.g. every 10 se
Hi.
Kris Kennaway wrote:
In the "good" case you are getting a much higher interrupt rate but
with the data you provided I can't tell where from. You need to run
vmstat -i at regular intervals (e.g. every 10 seconds for a minute)
during the "good" and "bad" times, since it only provides counte
Alexey Popov wrote:
Hi.
Kris Kennaway wrote:te:
In the "good" case you are getting a much higher interrupt rate but
with the data you provided I can't tell where from. You need to run
vmstat -i at regular intervals (e.g. every 10 seconds for a minute)
during the "good" and "bad" times, sinc
Hi.
Kris Kennaway wrote:te:
In the "good" case you are getting a much higher interrupt rate but with
the data you provided I can't tell where from. You need to run vmstat
-i at regular intervals (e.g. every 10 seconds for a minute) during the
"good" and "bad" times, since it only provides co
Alexey Popov wrote:
Hi
Kris Kennaway wrote:
So I can conclude that FreeBSD has a long standing bug in VM that
could be triggered when serving large amount of static data (much
bigger than memory size) on high rates. Possibly this only
applies to large files like mp3 or video.
It is possible
Hi
Kris Kennaway wrote:
So I can conclude that FreeBSD has a long standing bug in VM that
could be triggered when serving large amount of static data (much
bigger than memory size) on high rates. Possibly this only applies
to large files like mp3 or video.
It is possible, we have further wor
Alexey Popov wrote:
Hi
Kris Kennaway wrote:
So I can conclude that FreeBSD has a long standing bug in VM that
could be triggered when serving large amount of static data (much
bigger than memory size) on high rates. Possibly this only applies
to large files like mp3 or video.
It is possible
Hi
Scott Long wrote:
interrupt total rate
irq6: fdc0 8 0
irq14: ata0 47 0
irq16: uhci0 1428187319 1851
^^ [1]
irq18:
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:57:16 -0600 Scott Long wrote:
> Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > Since nobody answered so far, here is my two cents. I'm not an expert
> > here so it's only my imho.
> >
> > On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:52:49 +0400 Alexey Popov wrote:
> >
> >> interrupt total
Boris Samorodov wrote:
Hi!
Since nobody answered so far, here is my two cents. I'm not an expert
here so it's only my imho.
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:52:49 +0400 Alexey Popov wrote:
interrupt total rate
irq6: fdc0 8 0
irq14: ata
Hi!
Since nobody answered so far, here is my two cents. I'm not an expert
here so it's only my imho.
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:52:49 +0400 Alexey Popov wrote:
> interrupt total rate
> irq6: fdc0 8 0
> irq14: ata0
Hi
Kris Kennaway wrote:
And few hours ago I received feed back from Andrzej Tobola, he has
the same problem on FreeBSD 7 with Promise ATA software mirror:
Well, he didnt provide any evidence yet that it is the same problem,
so let's not become confused by feelings :)
I think he is telling about
Kris Kennaway wrote:
What else can i try?
Still waiting on the vmstat -z output.
Also can you please obtain vmstat -i, netstat -m and 10 seconds of
representative vmstat -w output when the problem is and is not occurring?
Kris
___
freebsd-stabl
Alexey Popov wrote:
This is very unlikely, because I have 5 another video storage servers
of the same hardware and software configurations and they feel good.
Clearly something is different about them, though. If you can
characterize exactly what that is then it will help.
I can't see any diff
Hi.
Kris Kennaway wrote:
After some time of running under high load disk performance become
expremely poor. At that periods 'systat -vm 1' shows something like
this:
This web service is similiar to YouTube. This server is video store. I
have around 200G of *.flv (flash video) files on the serv
Alexey Popov wrote:
Hi.
Kris Kennaway wrote:
After some time of running under high load disk performance become
expremely poor. At that periods 'systat -vm 1' shows something like
this:
What does "high load" mean? You need to explain the system workload
more.
This web service is similiar t
* Alexey Popov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> So I can conclude that FreeBSD has a long standing bug in VM that
> could be triggered when serving large amount of static data (much
> bigger than memory size) on high rates. Possibly this only applies to
> large files like mp3 or video.
I've seen high
other projects and they work
well. Also Linux on them works.
And few hours ago I received feed back from Andrzej Tobola, he has the
same problem on FreeBSD 7 with Promise ATA software mirror:
===
Subject: Re: amrd disk performance drop after running under high load
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 200
Hi.
Krassimir Slavchev wrote:
You run apache with mod_perl or php too. How many clients handle this
apache server? Also in this light load you have locked files! Check
script execution times (/server-status may be useful).
When you have hight load check swap usage and haw many processes are in
Alexey Popov wrote:
Hi.
Kris Kennaway wrote:
After some time of running under high load disk performance become
expremely poor. At that periods 'systat -vm 1' shows something like
this:
What does "high load" mean? You need to explain the system workload
more.
This web service is similiar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexey Popov wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
>>> After some time of running under high load disk performance become
>>> expremely poor. At that periods 'systat -vm 1' shows something like
>>> this:
>> What does "high load" mean? You need to
Alexey Popov wrote:
After some time of running under high load disk performance become
expremely poor. At that periods 'systat -vm 1' shows something like this:
What does "high load" mean? You need to explain the system workload more.
Disks amrd0
KB/t 85.39
tps 5
MB/s 0.38
% busy
Hi.
I have 3 Dell 2850 with DELL PERC4 SCSI RAID5 6x300GB running lighttpd
serving flash video at around 200Mbit/s.
%grep amr /var/run/dmesg.boot
amr0: mem
0xf80f-0xf80f,0xfe9c-0xfe9f irq 46 at device 14.0 on pci2
amr0: Using 64-bit DMA
amr0: delete logical drives supported
28 matches
Mail list logo
