> If you didn't do any custom tuning with newfs, it's likely that
>
> newfs -N -b 8192 -f 1024 # pre 4.6
>
> or
>
> newfs -N -b 16384 -f 2048 # 4.6 and up
>
> will be sufficient.
Yeah. But this system was set up in times when newfs did not optimize
cyl/group ratio and I
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Phil Kernick wrote:
> >
> > Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> > >
> > > Is there an official way to get list of superblock backups for existing
> > > filesystem, other than backup/newfs/restore ?
> > >
> >
> > Yes. Use newfs -N which will print out the superbl
Phil Kernick wrote:
>
> Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> >
> > Is there an official way to get list of superblock backups for existing
> > filesystem, other than backup/newfs/restore ?
> >
>
> Yes. Use newfs -N which will print out the superblock locations. My
> experience also tells me to also put exa
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Is there an official way to get list of superblock backups for existing
filesystem, other than backup/newfs/restore ?
Yes. Use newfs -N which will print out the superblock locations. My
experience also tells me to also put exactly the same parameters on the newfs
lin
>Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 09:58:40 +0700
>From: Eugene Grosbein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Recently I suffered from unstable power supply, after reboot
>fsck said INCORRECT SUPER BLOCK, BAD MAGIC etc. etc.
>I managed to revive filesystem using fsck -b 32 as I remember
>that first copy of superblock is gen
Hi!
Recently I suffered from unstable power supply, after reboot
fsck said INCORRECT SUPER BLOCK, BAD MAGIC etc. etc.
I managed to revive filesystem using fsck -b 32 as I remember
that first copy of superblock is generally located at block 32.
I wonder, however, how can I know complete list of su
