Re: stable/13 buildworld fail

___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: stable/13 buildworld fail

On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 04:43:57PM +0100, Peter Cornelius wrote: > G'day, folks, > > Is anyone else seeing something like below? (Because if not, I messed up > something and need to continue to search for what it may have been...) > > Last change, I believe was commit ced29ea4fb42a70301ba0770ec2

stable/13 buildworld fail

G'day, folks, Is anyone else seeing something like below? (Because if not, I messed up something and need to continue to search for what it may have been...) Last change, I believe was commit ced29ea4fb42a70301ba0770ec23e350155289f1 (HEAD -> stable/13, origin/stable/13), last successful build s

Re: 12.2-RELEASE buildworld fail at cddl/zfs / libuutil.so

On 27.01.2021 19:31, parv/freebsd wrote: # git log --pretty=fuller --grep libuutil release/12.2.0. .stable/12 commit 30ec3f368d Author:     Eugene Grosbein AuthorDate: Dec.2020.1206-1622 + Commit:     Eugene Grosbein CommitDate: Dec.2020.1206-1622 +     MFC r364027 b

Re: 12.2-RELEASE buildworld fail at cddl/zfs / libuutil.so

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 6:10 AM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: Hi Tomasz, On 27.01.2021 12:52, parv/freebsd wrote: > ... > > # /usr/bin/time -h make buildkernel buildworld NO_CLEAN=1 > > . ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ > > Perhaps try with cleaning out first buildworld, then

Re: 12.2-RELEASE buildworld fail at cddl/zfs / libuutil.so

Hello PARV :-) On 27.01.2021 12:52, parv/freebsd wrote: > What is the git commit hash (for others)? For the 12.2-RELEASE: # git branch main * releng/12.2 stable/12 # git log --pretty=oneline | head 97eb1441ca7b602510a81fd512d830563998b3e7 PS/2 Synaptics touchpad identification fix. 2120d0

Re: 12.2-RELEASE buildworld fail at cddl/zfs / libuutil.so

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 7:45 PM Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > I cannot buildworld for 12.2-RELEASE. Using /usr/src as svn or git no > matter (its set to releng/12.2). Did clean /usr/obj. Any hints welcome :-) > > # uname -a > FreeBSD hexagon 12.2-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 12.2-RELEASE-p1 GENERIC amd64 > What

12.2-RELEASE buildworld fail at cddl/zfs / libuutil.so

Hello world! I cannot buildworld for 12.2-RELEASE. Using /usr/src as svn or git no matter (its set to releng/12.2). Did clean /usr/obj. Any hints welcome :-) # uname -a FreeBSD hexagon 12.2-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 12.2-RELEASE-p1 GENERIC amd64 # /usr/bin/time -h make buildkernel buildworld NO_CLE

Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ?

Ian Lepore wrote: > On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 09:52 +, Holger Kipp wrote: > > Dear Scott, > > > > Am 26.01.2018 um 09:07 schrieb Scott Bennett > > >: > > > > cd /usr/src; PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin MAKE_CMD=make > > /usr/obj/usr/src/make.amd64/bmake -m /usr/src/share/mk -f Makefile.in

Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ?

On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 09:52 +, Holger Kipp wrote: > Dear Scott, > > Am 26.01.2018 um 09:07 schrieb Scott Bennett > >: > > cd /usr/src; PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin MAKE_CMD=make > /usr/obj/usr/src/make.amd64/bmake -m /usr/src/share/mk -f Makefile.inc1 > TARGET=amd64 TARGET_ARCH=amd64

Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ?

Dear Scott, Am 26.01.2018 um 09:07 schrieb Scott Bennett mailto:benn...@sdf.org>>: cd /usr/src; PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin MAKE_CMD=make /usr/obj/usr/src/make.amd64/bmake -m /usr/src/share/mk -f Makefile.inc1 TARGET=amd64 TARGET_ARCH=amd64 MK_META_MODE=no cleandir bmake: illegal argume

Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ?

e: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ? > > > > > > > > > > I wrote: > > > > > &g

Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ?

On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 12:40 +, tech-lists wrote: > 2. I don't know the difference between svnlite and svn. All I know is > that svnlite is in base and it will be in base for reasons and one of > those reasons will be that it works reliably. I think svn in ports might > be more featureful, but m

Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ?

On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 00:25 -0600, Scott Bennett wrote: > Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 12:39 +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > > > > > On 24 Jan 2018, at 09:51, Scott Bennett wrote: > > > > > > > > > &g

Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ?

On 25/01/2018 06:22, Scott Bennett wrote: > tech-lists wrote: > >> On 24/01/2018 08:51, Scott Bennett wrote: >>> hellas# mv /etc/make.conf{,.save} >>> hellas# mv /etc/src.conf{,.save} >>> hellas# cd /usr/src >>> hellas# make cleandir >>> "/usr/src/share/mk/local.sys.mk", line 51:

Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ?

Ian Lepore wrote: > On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 12:39 +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > On 24 Jan 2018, at 09:51, Scott Bennett wrote: > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ? > > > > > > I wrote: > &

Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ?

tech-lists wrote: > On 24/01/2018 08:51, Scott Bennett wrote: > > hellas# mv /etc/make.conf{,.save} > > hellas# mv /etc/src.conf{,.save} > > hellas# cd /usr/src > > hellas# make cleandir > > "/usr/src/share/mk/local.sys.mk", line 51: Malformed conditional > > (${.MAKE.MODE:Mmeta*

Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ?

Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 24 Jan 2018, at 09:51, Scott Bennett wrote: > > > > Subject: Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ? > > > > I wrote: > >>On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 12:42:58 + lists wrote: > >>> On 22/01/2018 09:17, Scott

Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ?

On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 12:39 +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 24 Jan 2018, at 09:51, Scott Bennett wrote: > > > > > > Subject: Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ? > > > > I wrote: > > > > > >    On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 12:42:58 +

Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ?

On 24/01/2018 08:15, Scott Bennett wrote: >> Hi, > > Thank you for responding with your thoughts on this. >> >> What I'd do is firstly to make things as simple as possible. First do >> the upgrade simply. Either delete or call make.conf & src.conf something > > Okay. > >> else. Then g

Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ?

On 24/01/2018 08:51, Scott Bennett wrote: > hellas# mv /etc/make.conf{,.save} > hellas# mv /etc/src.conf{,.save} > hellas# cd /usr/src > hellas# make cleandir > "/usr/src/share/mk/local.sys.mk", line 51: Malformed conditional > (${.MAKE.MODE:Mmeta*} != "") > "/usr/src/share

Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ?

On 24 Jan 2018, at 09:51, Scott Bennett wrote: > > Subject: Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ? > > I wrote: >>On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 12:42:58 + lists wrote: >>> On 22/01/2018 09:17, Scott Bennett wrote: >>>>Anyway, I'm stuc

Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ?

Subject: Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ? I wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 12:42:58 + lists wrote: >>On 22/01/2018 09:17, Scott Bennett wrote: >>> Anyway, I'm stuck. Can someone please tell me what is going wrong and >>> how to fix it

Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ?

Subject: Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ? On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 12:42:58 + lists wrote: >On 22/01/2018 09:17, Scott Bennett wrote: >> Anyway, I'm stuck. Can someone please tell me what is going wrong and >> how to fix it? I'd really like to be

Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ?

On 22/01/2018 09:17, Scott Bennett wrote: > Anyway, I'm stuck. Can someone please tell me what is going wrong and > how to fix it? I'd really like to be able to update my system, not only to > keep it reasonably current, but also to be able to customize a kernel. Thanks > in advance for any

why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ?

I tried asking for help on this several days ago on freebsd-questions@, but got no responses. I'm trying freebsd-stable@ next because it involves trying to build world on a 11.1-STABLE system from a freshly checked out, unaltered source tree at r328251. The system currently installed is from

Re: buildworld fail in stable/11 @r325033 -- r325029?

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 05:42:18PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > ... > Can you confirm that the following patch allows your system to build ? > > Index: lib/libprocstat/libprocstat.c > === > --- lib/libprocstat/libprocstat.c

Re: buildworld fail in stable/11 @r325033 -- r325029?

Bezüglich Konstantin Belousov's Nachricht vom 27.10.2017 16:42 (localtime): > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 04:12:54AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: >> This is observed on systems (both my laptop & my build machine) running >> stable/11 @r325003, after updating sources to r325033: >> >> --- libprocstat.

Re: buildworld fail in stable/11 @r325033 -- r325029?

Bezüglich David Wolfskill's Nachricht vom 27.10.2017 13:12 (localtime): > This is observed on systems (both my laptop & my build machine) running > stable/11 @r325003, after updating sources to r325033: > > --- libprocstat.o --- > In file included from /usr/src/lib/libprocstat/libprocstat.c:69: >

Re: buildworld fail in stable/11 @r325033 -- r325029?

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 04:12:54AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > This is observed on systems (both my laptop & my build machine) running > stable/11 @r325003, after updating sources to r325033: > > --- libprocstat.o --- > In file included from /usr/src/lib/libprocstat/libprocstat.c:69: > /usr/ob

Re: buildworld fail in stable/11 @r325033 -- r325029?

FWIW - I had a successful build yesterday on stable/11 r325010; I have not tried anything newer yet. Dan David Wolfskill writes: > This is observed on systems (both my laptop & my build machine) running > stable/11 @r325003, after updating sources to r325033: > > --- libprocstat.o --- > In fil

buildworld fail in stable/11 @r325033 -- r325029?

This is observed on systems (both my laptop & my build machine) running stable/11 @r325003, after updating sources to r325033: --- libprocstat.o --- In file included from /usr/src/lib/libprocstat/libprocstat.c:69: /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include/sys/ptrace.h:148:19: error: field has incomplete t

Re: /usr/src over NFS: buildworld fail

Andrew Romanenko wrote: > On 05/02/2013 01:30 AM, Rick Macklem wrote: > > Andrew Romanenko wrote: > >> On 04/30/2013 02:51 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > >>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 09:42:06PM +0300, Andrew Romanenko wrote: > Hi everyone! > /usr/src imported via NFS > make buildworld i

Re: /usr/src over NFS: buildworld fail

On 05/02/2013 01:30 AM, Rick Macklem wrote: > Andrew Romanenko wrote: >> On 04/30/2013 02:51 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 09:42:06PM +0300, Andrew Romanenko wrote: Hi everyone! /usr/src imported via NFS make buildworld is always fails in the same place with

Re: /usr/src over NFS: buildworld fail

Andrew Romanenko wrote: > On 04/30/2013 02:51 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 09:42:06PM +0300, Andrew Romanenko wrote: > >> Hi everyone! > >> /usr/src imported via NFS > >> make buildworld is always fails in the same place with error: > >> "make: result too large". > >> Loca

Re: /usr/src over NFS: buildworld fail

On 04/30/2013 02:51 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 09:42:06PM +0300, Andrew Romanenko wrote: >> Hi everyone! >> /usr/src imported via NFS >> make buildworld is always fails in the same place with error: "make: result >> too large". >> Localy its works fine >> Does anybody kno

Re: /usr/src over NFS: buildworld fail

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 09:42:06PM +0300, Andrew Romanenko wrote: > Hi everyone! > /usr/src imported via NFS > make buildworld is always fails in the same place with error: "make: result > too large". > Localy its works fine > Does anybody know how to fix it? > > i386 FreeBSD 9-STABLE (r250044)

Re: /usr/src over NFS: buildworld fail

Andrew Romanenko writes: > /usr/src imported via NFS > make buildworld is always fails in the same place with error: "make: result > too large". > Localy its works fine > Does anybody know how to fix it? I've been doing that for years, with no problems. If you NFS-mount the src tree, do you do

/usr/src over NFS: buildworld fail

Hi everyone! /usr/src imported via NFS make buildworld is always fails in the same place with error: "make: result too large". Localy its works fine Does anybody know how to fix it? i386 FreeBSD 9-STABLE (r250044) Best regards, Andrew Romanenko ___ fr

Re: buildworld FAIL.

On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 18:25:09 +0200 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: PJD> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:44:31PM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote: >> >> On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 09:38:39 -0500 Matthew D. Fuller wrote: >> >> MDF> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 05:52:47AM -0700 I heard the voice of >> MDF> Jeremy Cha

Re: buildworld FAIL.

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:44:31PM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote: > > On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 09:38:39 -0500 Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > > MDF> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 05:52:47AM -0700 I heard the voice of > MDF> Jeremy Chadwick, and lo! it spake thus: > >> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 09:04:42AM +0200, Pa

Re: buildworld FAIL.

On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 09:38:39 -0500 Matthew D. Fuller wrote: MDF> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 05:52:47AM -0700 I heard the voice of MDF> Jeremy Chadwick, and lo! it spake thus: >> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 09:04:42AM +0200, Pawel Tyll wrote: >> > So was NO_OPENSSL deprecated or something? >> >> I

Re: buildworld FAIL.

Hi Jeremy, >> So was NO_OPENSSL deprecated or something? > I think he's implying that hast indirectly relies upon OpenSSL. > I would classify this as a bug/oversight that should be properly dealt > with via an #error statement or similar -- the current result (what > you've reported) is not acce

Re: buildworld FAIL.

On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 05:52:47AM -0700 I heard the voice of Jeremy Chadwick, and lo! it spake thus: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 09:04:42AM +0200, Pawel Tyll wrote: > > So was NO_OPENSSL deprecated or something? > > I think he's implying that hast indirectly relies upon OpenSSL. There's some condi

Re: buildworld FAIL.

On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 09:04:42AM +0200, Pawel Tyll wrote: > Hi Matthew, > > > NO_OPENSSL, no -DHAVE_CRYPTO. No -DHAVE_CRYPTO, no #include > > hast_checksum.h. > So was NO_OPENSSL deprecated or something? I think he's implying that hast indirectly relies upon OpenSSL. I would classify this as

Re: buildworld FAIL.

Hi Matthew, > NO_OPENSSL, no -DHAVE_CRYPTO. No -DHAVE_CRYPTO, no #include > hast_checksum.h. So was NO_OPENSSL deprecated or something? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe

Re: buildworld FAIL.

On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 02:25:01AM +0200 I heard the voice of Pawel Tyll, and lo! it spake thus: > > /usr/src/sbin/hastctl/../hastd/hast_proto.c:72: error: 'checksum_send' > undeclared here (not in a function) > /usr/src/sbin/hastctl/../hastd/hast_proto.c:72: error: 'checksum_recv' > undeclared

Re: buildworld FAIL.

Hi Doug, > Traditional solution for similar problems is to clean out your /usr/obj/ > and try again. I always do that. If build fails, I delete /usr/obj and try again without -j. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mail

Re: buildworld FAIL.

On 04/22/2011 17:35, Pawel Tyll wrote: Hi Jeremy, What tag are you following / FreeBSD version are you using? I ask because you have a bunch of variables in make.conf that probably need to go into /etc/src.conf. It's RELENG_8. 8-STABLE. Yeah, this make.conf kept growing in stuff since like FB

Re: buildworld FAIL.

Hi Jeremy, > What tag are you following / FreeBSD version are you using? I ask > because you have a bunch of variables in make.conf that probably need to > go into /etc/src.conf. It's RELENG_8. 8-STABLE. Yeah, this make.conf kept growing in stuff since like FBSD4 :) > I just rebuild world and ke

Re: buildworld FAIL.

On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 02:25:01AM +0200, Pawel Tyll wrote: > Hi list, > > ===> sbin/hastctl (all) > cc -O2 -pipe -I/usr/src/sbin/hastctl/../hastd -DINET -DINET6 -DYY_NO_UNPUT > -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k > -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-proto

buildworld FAIL.

Hi list, ===> sbin/hastctl (all) cc -O2 -pipe -I/usr/src/sbin/hastctl/../hastd -DINET -DINET6 -DYY_NO_UNPUT -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -W

Re: buildworld fail?

Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 09:47:23AM +0300, Krassimir Slavchev wrote: ===> usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/snmp_bridge (depend) cat /usr/src/usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/snmp_bridge/bridge_tree.def | gensnmptree -p bridge_ line 31: '(' expected at begin of node context: " TruthValue

Re: buildworld fail?

On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 09:47:23AM +0300, Krassimir Slavchev wrote: > ===> usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/snmp_bridge (depend) > cat /usr/src/usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/snmp_bridge/bridge_tree.def | > gensnmptree -p bridge_ > line 31: '(' expected at begin of node > context: " TruthValue ENUM ( > *** Error

buildworld fail?

===> usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/snmp_bridge (depend) cat /usr/src/usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/snmp_bridge/bridge_tree.def | gensnmptree -p bridge_ line 31: '(' expected at begin of node context: " TruthValue ENUM ( *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/snmp_bridge. *** Error code 1

Re: make buildworld fail @/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl

No, no-one answered. There was a thread about it which said it was due to a 1 billion second bug in cvsup, and you needed to get cvsup-16.e.tgz, and install it, rm -rf /usr/src rm -rf /usr/obj, and cvsup again. But that didn't work for me. Someone also suggested to again delete everything, and

Buildworld fail for 4.4-stable

Hello All, It has been forth day I trying to compile the world, but with out luck! :( I have a 4.2RC-1 installed, and recently updated though cvsup source tree. I got a compilation error while building "world". I tried several things to fix it: 1. Delete and checkout again /usr/src 2. Delete /usr