In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matt Dillon
writes:
>
> :In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> James writes:
> :: If I understand it correctly, there is a limit to the maximum number
> :: of command line arguments that a program can have.
> :
> :Yes, but unless you've built all the ports, you won't eve
{cc's trimmed}
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 03:24:01PM -0800, Matt Dillon wrote:
> It would be even better if the ports system could look in two places
> for distfiles ... so I could build up local repository on the NFS
> server that clients would use directly, and still allow clients
>
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 12:35:27AM -0600, David Kelly wrote:
> I'm sure to be off my rocker to suggest something like this 2 days
> before -RELEASE, but sometimes I don't clean up after installing a port
^^
WHY are you post
On 11/19/00, Roelof Osinga wrote:
> Jing-Tang Keith Jang wrote:
> > --
> > Keep it simple and stupid.
>
> A little off topic, but... This is too nice for an old USA army
> expression (genie forces). Try:
>
> Keep It Simple, Stupid!
This is intentional. :-)
--
Keep it simple and stupid.
To
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, James writes:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 03:11:38PM +0800, Jing-Tang Keith Jang wrote:
> > On 11/18/00, James wrote:
> > > Or for a much faster solution:
> > > find /usr/ports -type d -name work -prune -print -exec rm -r {} \;
> >
> > why not just "cd /usr/ports; rm
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jing-Tang Keith
Jang wri
tes:
> On 11/18/00, James wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 12:35:27AM -0600, David Kelly wrote:
> > > # find /usr/ports -type d -name work -print -execdir make clean \; -prune
> > >
> > > is much faster than "make clean" from the top. It
Jing-Tang Keith Jang wrote:
>
> --
> Keep it simple and stupid.
A little off topic, but... This is too nice for an old USA army
expression (genie forces). Try:
Keep It Simple, Stupid!
Roelof
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the
That's because the make clean in /usr/ports follows the dependencies which
makes it clean a lot of ports several times...
What you can try is to do a make -DNOCLEANDEPENDS clean.
Regards,
Maxime Henrion
David Kelly wrote:
> I'm sure to be off my rocker to suggest something like this 2 days
> b
