On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 4:32 AM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 08:55:21AM -0700, Kian Mohageri wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Stef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Kian Mohageri wrote:
>> >> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 3:33 AM, Johan Ström <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:32:13AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 08:55:21AM -0700, Kian Mohageri wrote:
> > A similar/related problem was addressed in OpenBSD 4.3
> > (http://www.openbsd.org/plus43.html).
> >
> > * In pf(4), allow state reuse if both sides are in FIN_WA
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 08:55:21AM -0700, Kian Mohageri wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Stef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Kian Mohageri wrote:
> >> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 3:33 AM, Johan Ström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> On May 18, 2008, at 9:19 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Stef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kian Mohageri wrote:
>> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 3:33 AM, Johan Ström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On May 18, 2008, at 9:19 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>>
Johan Ström wrote:
> drop all traffic)? A check with pfctl -vsr
Kian Mohageri wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 3:33 AM, Johan Ström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On May 18, 2008, at 9:19 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>
>>> Johan Ström wrote:
>>>
drop all traffic)? A check with pfctl -vsr reveals that the actual rule
inserted is "pass on lo0 inet from 123
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 3:33 AM, Johan Ström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 18, 2008, at 9:19 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
>> Johan Ström wrote:
>>
>>> drop all traffic)? A check with pfctl -vsr reveals that the actual rule
>>> inserted is "pass on lo0 inet from 123.123.123.123 to 123.123.123.1
On May 18, 2008, at 9:19 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Johan Ström wrote:
drop all traffic)? A check with pfctl -vsr reveals that the actual
rule inserted is "pass on lo0 inet from 123.123.123.123 to
123.123.123.123 flags S/SA keep state". Where did that "keep state"
come from?
'flags S/SA
Johan Ström wrote:
drop all traffic)? A check with pfctl -vsr reveals that the actual rule
inserted is "pass on lo0 inet from 123.123.123.123 to 123.123.123.123
flags S/SA keep state". Where did that "keep state" come from?
'flags S/SA keep state' is the default now for tcp filter rules -- th
First of all, for freebsd-pf subscribers, I posted my original problem
(in the bottom) to freebsd-net earlier, but replies seems to point to
PF so I'll CC there too..
On May 17, 2008, at 5:19 PM, Alex Trull wrote:
Hi Johan and List,
In my case a few months ago it was pahu. Don't give tha
Hi Johan and List,
In my case a few months ago it was pahu. Don't give that fine fellow an
account on your precious system !
But seriously, I had a pf-firewalled jail being being used for DNS
testing, with large numbers of udp "connections" hanging around in pf
state. While the default udp timeou
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 04:33:20PM +0200, Johan Ström wrote:
> Hello
>
> I got a FreeBSD 7 machine running mail services (among other things). This
> machine recently replaced a FreeBSD 6.2 machine doing the same tasks.
> Now and then I need to send alot of mail to customers (mailing list), and
>
Hello
I got a FreeBSD 7 machine running mail services (among other things).
This machine recently replaced a FreeBSD 6.2 machine doing the same
tasks.
Now and then I need to send alot of mail to customers (mailing list),
and one thing i've noticed now after the change is that when I use a
12 matches
Mail list logo
