Re: 5.1 release cvsuping

2003-09-07 Thread Andrew J Caines
tony, > I just installed 5.1 release and I usually cvsup to stable but I'm not sure > there is a stable version yet. There is always -STABLE. It's about to feature the 4.9 release. 5.x is still -CURRENT. > should I bother with cvsuping? cvsup is a great way to get update

RE: 5.1 release cvsuping

2003-09-07 Thread tony
is this what I want? RELENG_5_1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of tony Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 3:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 5.1 release cvsuping sorry to bother everyone but I've been pretty inactive lately. I

5.1 release cvsuping

2003-09-07 Thread tony
sorry to bother everyone but I've been pretty inactive lately. I just installed 5.1 release and I usually cvsup to stable but I'm not sure there is a stable version yet. should I bother with cvsuping? I have always followed the stable track.. This is for a firewall machine with si

Re: cvsuping

2001-08-17 Thread John Polstra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tomas Palfi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i'am trying to cvsup on 4.3 stable and as i am connected through a firewall > i've been at it for a relatively long time. the messages i was getting were > all related to the firewall configuration (ie. connection refused, n

cvsuping

2001-08-17 Thread Tomas Palfi
hi i'am trying to cvsup on 4.3 stable and as i am connected through a firewall i've been at it for a relatively long time. the messages i was getting were all related to the firewall configuration (ie. connection refused, not being able to get to the open at all etc.) we tweaked our firewall and