Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > What's being lost
> >here, when it is disabled, instead of being handled as the
> >card manufacturer expects the OS to handle it?
>
> From my perspective, negative functionality is being lost. There is a
> nice comment in the source code explaining what it is...
[ ... ac
At 10:52 PM 8/27/2001 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
>Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > >fxp0: port 0xc400-0xc43f mem
> > >0xd5001000-0xd5001fff irq 11 at device 8.0 on pci1
> > >fxp0: *** DISABLING DYNAMIC STANDBY MODE IN EEPROM ***
> > >fxp0: New EEPROM ID: 0x49a0
> > >fxp0: EEPROM checksum @ 0xff: 0xe441 ->
Mike Tancsa wrote:
> >fxp0: port 0xc400-0xc43f mem
> >0xd5001000-0xd5001fff irq 11 at device 8.0 on pci1
> >fxp0: *** DISABLING DYNAMIC STANDBY MODE IN EEPROM ***
> >fxp0: New EEPROM ID: 0x49a0
> >fxp0: EEPROM checksum @ 0xff: 0xe441 -> 0xe443
> >fxp0: *** PLEASE REBOOT THE SYSTEM NOW FOR CORRECT
