On Friday 11 November 2005 01:43, Jan Grant wrote:
Hope you don't mind me taking you up on your offer to someone else :-) -
this is more of a feature request from a portupgrade user who'd like to
migrate.
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Thursday 10 November 2005 09:42, Paul
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Friday 11 November 2005 01:43, Jan Grant wrote:
My pkgtools.conf has hundreds(! - busy workstation) of entries along
these lines - some entries apply to several ports, and the portupgrade
toolset just basically uses the union of all
On Friday 11 November 2005 05:44, Jan Grant wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Friday 11 November 2005 01:43, Jan Grant wrote:
My pkgtools.conf has hundreds(! - busy workstation) of entries along
these lines - some entries apply to several ports, and the portupgrade
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
[on wildcards in portmanager rules]
Silly me, I get it now. Not supported yet but I like the idea so am adding it
to the things to do list. This one will be near the top.
That's great! - especially since that pretty much makes it a mechanical
On Friday 11 November 2005 05:58, Jan Grant wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
[on wildcards in portmanager rules]
Silly me, I get it now. Not supported yet but I like the idea so am
adding it to the things to do list. This one will be near the top.
That's great! -
On Friday 11 November 2005 05:58, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Friday 11 November 2005 05:58, Jan Grant wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
[on wildcards in portmanager rules]
Silly me, I get it now. Not supported yet but I like the idea so am
adding it to the things
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Friday 11 November 2005 05:58, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Friday 11 November 2005 05:58, Jan Grant wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
[on wildcards in portmanager rules]
Silly me, I get it now. Not supported
On Friday 11 November 2005 06:26, Jan Grant wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Friday 11 November 2005 05:58, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Friday 11 November 2005 05:58, Jan Grant wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
[on wildcards in
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
One last thing, if you make a script that does the conversion, might I
have a copy? Here is how I'll set up pm-020.conf to work:
Surely. pkgtools.conf is actually a ruby script: I've no idea how
dynamically the rules are evaluated but
On Friday 11 November 2005 07:23, Jan Grant wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
One last thing, if you make a script that does the conversion, might
I have a copy? Here is how I'll set up pm-020.conf to work:
Surely. pkgtools.conf is actually a ruby script: I've no
On Friday 11 November 2005 07:29, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Friday 11 November 2005 07:23, Jan Grant wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
One last thing, if you make a script that does the conversion,
might I have a copy? Here is how I'll set up pm-020.conf to work:
Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Works good, just one thing, portmanager has no dependencies, like to keep it
that way.
It's not necessary to consider that an issue: this functionality is
really only useful to someone who has had portupgrade installed
anyway.
On Friday 11 November 2005 08:32, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Works good, just one thing, portmanager has no dependencies, like to keep
it that way.
It's not necessary to consider that an issue: this functionality is
really only useful to someone who
On Friday 11 November 2005 09:04, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Friday 11 November 2005 08:32, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Works good, just one thing, portmanager has no dependencies, like to
keep it that
On Friday 11 November 2005 07:23, Jan Grant wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
One last thing, if you make a script that does the conversion, might
I have a copy? Here is how I'll set up pm-020.conf to work:
Surely. pkgtools.conf is actually a ruby script: I've no
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 18:26, Paul Root wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
***
This message has been scanned by the InterScan for CSC-SSM and found to
be free of known security risks. ***-***
port and install or restart gnome-upgrade.sh
I'm now
to
be free of known security risks. ***-***
port and install or restart gnome-upgrade.sh
I'm now assuming that since all gnome has been wiped off the
disk, that the thing to do is build/install the port directly.
Starting that up, I seem to be having the same downloading
:
***
This message has been scanned by the InterScan for CSC-SSM and found to
be free of known security risks. ***-***
port and install or restart gnome-upgrade.sh
I'm now assuming that since all gnome has been wiped off the
disk, that the thing to do is build
On Thursday 10 November 2005 11:32, Paul T. Root wrote:
Things are running better now. I moved it to a dedicated
DSL line in my lab, and it's chugging along.
I see an occasional g_vfs_done message fly across. Error 16
on a read.
Something like
g_vfs_done: acd0[READ(offset=81920,
://www.freebsd.org/gnome tells us not to use portupgrade
to upgrade gnome2. The upgrades get out of order.
Ok fine, use gnome-upgrade.sh. And keep trying it says.
I've run it better than a dozen times, now. It's still trying.
All day, I turn and look at it periodically, resolve whatever
problem
is out, I want to upgrade to that.
Seems resonable.
http://www.freebsd.org/gnome tells us not to use portupgrade
to upgrade gnome2. The upgrades get out of order.
Ok fine, use gnome-upgrade.sh. And keep trying it says.
I've run it better than a dozen times, now. It's still trying.
All day
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 13:46, Paul T. Root wrote:
This script is one of the most frustrating things ever
written.
[Snip]
As an alternative to gnome-upgrade.sh you may want to consider
using sysutils/portmanager, all you need do is run
portmanager x11
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 14:41, Alistair wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 13:46, Paul T. Root wrote:
This script is one of the most frustrating things ever
written.
[Snip]
As an alternative to gnome-upgrade.sh you may want to consider
using sysutils
23 matches
Mail list logo
