On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 15:12:34 +0700 Eugene Grosbein
wrote about Re: high cpu irq load and slow boot after update from 10.4 to
11.2:
> Just report all that you have already tested, and results (lack of).
I didn't pipe all the debug info into files so far, so I'll have to wait a
few
29.11.2018 15:10, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 14:48:29 +0700 Eugene Grosbein
> wrote about Re: high cpu irq load and slow boot after update from 10.4 to
> 11.2:
>
>> Fill a PR and include exact output showing IRQs and their count numbers.
>
> Which outpu
On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 14:48:29 +0700 Eugene Grosbein
wrote about Re: high cpu irq load and slow boot after update from 10.4 to
11.2:
> Fill a PR and include exact output showing IRQs and their count numbers.
Which output would that include? Is vmstat -i sufficient? Should I revert
to the defa
29.11.2018 14:01, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 07:48:23 +0100 Gerrit Kühn
> wrote about Re: high cpu irq load and slow boot after update from 10.4 to
> 11.2:
>
>> The issue is back this morning: sys and irq load incredibly high, system
>> hardly usable anymo
On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 07:48:23 +0100 Gerrit Kühn
wrote about Re: high cpu irq load and slow boot after update from 10.4 to
11.2:
> The issue is back this morning: sys and irq load incredibly high, system
> hardly usable anymore.
> I guess it's time to try kern.eventtimer.periodic=1 n
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 15:37:02 +0100 Gerrit Kühn
wrote about Re: high cpu irq load and slow boot after update from 10.4 to
11.2:
> > Try switching to "HPET" in both cases and do not wait for next disaster
> > but do it right now with sysctl command, reboot is not neede
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 21:09:18 +0700 Eugene Grosbein
wrote about Re: high cpu irq load and slow boot after update from 10.4 to
11.2:
> Try switching to "HPET" in both cases and do not wait for next disaster
> but do it right now with sysctl command, reboot is not needed.
> You
26.11.2018 20:14, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
> Which settings would be recommended to try? This is what I have now:
>
> ---
> root@storage:~ # sysctl kern.timecounter.hardware
> kern.timecounter.hardware: TSC
>
> root@storage:~ # sysctl kern.timecounter.choice
> kern.timecounter.choice: ACPI-safe(850) H
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 19:34:43 +0700 Eugene Grosbein
wrote about Re: high cpu irq load and slow boot after update from 10.4 to
11.2:
> > Any ideas?
> Maybe this box has some clocking problems incompatible with tickless
> kernel.
Is there anything I could look out for in dmesg o
26.11.2018 15:46, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
> A couple of weeks ago, I updated an older storage server (2 CPUs, 4 cores
> each, 48GB RAM, 36x4GB HDDs, 3 LSI-based mps controllers) from 10.4 to
> 11.2. The first thing I noticed was that booting takes much longer now. The
> system probes each HDD (there ar
Hi all,
A couple of weeks ago, I updated an older storage server (2 CPUs, 4 cores
each, 48GB RAM, 36x4GB HDDs, 3 LSI-based mps controllers) from 10.4 to
11.2. The first thing I noticed was that booting takes much longer now. The
system probes each HDD (there are 36 of them, attached to mps control
11 matches
Mail list logo