On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:47:57 +0500
"Eugene M. Zheganin" wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On 27.11.2015 01:37, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:19:18 +0500
> > "Eugene M. Zheganin" wrote:
> >
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> I'm using FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE as an application server, last week
> >> I've noticed
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Eugene M. Zheganin
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On 26.11.2015 14:19, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I'm using FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE as an application server, last week I've
> > noticed that disks are always busy while gstat shows that the activity
> > measured in io
Hi.
On 27.11.2015 01:37, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:19:18 +0500
> "Eugene M. Zheganin" wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I'm using FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE as an application server, last week I've
>> noticed that disks are always busy while gstat shows that the activity
>> measured in iops/read
Hi.
On 26.11.2015 14:19, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm using FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE as an application server, last week I've
> noticed that disks are always busy while gstat shows that the activity
> measured in iops/reads/writes is low, form my point of view:
>
>
> L(q) ops/sr/s k
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:19:18 +0500
"Eugene M. Zheganin" wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm using FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE as an application server, last week I've
> noticed that disks are always busy while gstat shows that the activity
> measured in iops/reads/writes is low, form my point of view:
>
Hi.
You hav
Hi.
I'm using FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE as an application server, last week I've
noticed that disks are always busy while gstat shows that the activity
measured in iops/reads/writes is low, form my point of view:
L(q) ops/sr/s kBps ms/rw/s kBps ms/w %busy Name
8 56 50
