On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:24 -0600, Brandon Gooch wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Da Rock
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 20:38 -0500, Damian Gerow wrote:
> >> Sam Leffler wrote:
> >> : OTOH iwn is now out of date and someone needs to update it. There's
> >> : newer firmware that is
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Da Rock wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 20:38 -0500, Damian Gerow wrote:
>> Sam Leffler wrote:
>> : OTOH iwn is now out of date and someone needs to update it. There's
>> : newer firmware that is supposed to fix many of the bugs I hit when I
>> : worked on the driv
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 20:38 -0500, Damian Gerow wrote:
> Sam Leffler wrote:
> : OTOH iwn is now out of date and someone needs to update it. There's
> : newer firmware that is supposed to fix many of the bugs I hit when I
> : worked on the driver (and Intel refused to acknowledge) and obsd has
>
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Damian Gerow wrote:
> Sam Leffler wrote:
> : OTOH iwn is now out of date and someone needs to update it. There's
> : newer firmware that is supposed to fix many of the bugs I hit when I
> : worked on the driver (and Intel refused to acknowledge) and obsd has
> : a
Sam Leffler wrote:
: OTOH iwn is now out of date and someone needs to update it. There's
: newer firmware that is supposed to fix many of the bugs I hit when I
: worked on the driver (and Intel refused to acknowledge) and obsd has
: added support for newer parts that people want. It'd be great
Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:17:39 -0600
Brandon Gooch wrote:
I have a working driver for the Intel 4965, aka iwn(4), loaded on my
Lenovo X300 running FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE (amd64).
FWIW, I am using the latest perforce version of the iwn driver a
2009/1/18 Brandon Gooch
> I have a working driver for the Intel 4965, aka iwn(4), loaded on my
> Lenovo X300 running FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE (amd64).
>
Wonderfull to say the least !
Seeing that you run successfully 7.1 on a X300 is excellent ! Did you manage
to get suspend/resume aka hibernation wo
The kernel panic was due to a NULL pointer dereference in the module.
The code that was commented out created a situation in which the array
of structs (line 2412):
static const struct iwn_chan_band iwn_bands[]
contained only 2 items. The code following the struct array that
obtained the list of
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:17:39 -0600
Brandon Gooch wrote:
I have a working driver for the Intel 4965, aka iwn(4), loaded on my
Lenovo X300 running FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE (amd64).
FWIW, I am using the latest perforce version of the iwn driver as
documented here[1] on a Thi
Da Rock wrote:
On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 14:17 -0600, Brandon Gooch wrote:
I have a working driver for the Intel 4965, aka iwn(4), loaded on my
Lenovo X300 running FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE (amd64).
This driver is a slightly-modified version of the iwn(4) driver
backported from 8.0-CURRENT by Gavin Atkin
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:17:39 -0600
Brandon Gooch wrote:
> I have a working driver for the Intel 4965, aka iwn(4), loaded on my
> Lenovo X300 running FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE (amd64).
FWIW, I am using the latest perforce version of the iwn driver as
documented here[1] on a ThinkPad T61 running FreeBSD
I have a working driver for the Intel 4965, aka iwn(4), loaded on my
Lenovo X300 running FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE (amd64).
This driver is a slightly-modified version of the iwn(4) driver
backported from 8.0-CURRENT by Gavin Atkinson:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=221758+0+/usr/local/www
12 matches
Mail list logo
