On 11/10/05, Xin LI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 11/10/05, Jens Holmqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > > trap number = 30
> > > panic: unknown/reserved trap
> > > Uptime: 46m5s
>
> Looks weird. Would you please also attach the dmesg.boot generated
> with "boot -v" (or verbose boot if
On 11/10/05, Jens Holmqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > trap number = 30
> > panic: unknown/reserved trap
> > Uptime: 46m5s
Looks weird. Would you please also attach the dmesg.boot generated
with "boot -v" (or verbose boot if you use beastie boot menu), which
may be helpful for us to fig
On 11/10/05, Jens Holmqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hello i got a problem with my 6.0 GENERIC kernel
> i have done a kgdb on the dumps it gave out here is the output
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>kgdb kernel.debug /usr/local/var/crash/vmcore.1
> [GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads:
> /u
hello i got a problem with my 6.0 GENERIC kernel
i have done a kgdb on the dumps it gave out here is the output
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>kgdb kernel.debug /usr/local/var/crash/vmcore.1
[GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads:
/usr/lib/libthread_db.so: Undefined symbol "ps_pglobal_looku
hello i got a problem with my 6.0 GENERIC kernel
i have done a kgdb on the dumps it gave out here is the output
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>kgdb kernel.debug /usr/local/var/crash/vmcore.1
[GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads: /usr/lib/libthread_db.so:
Undefined symbol "ps_pglobal_lookup"]
GNU gd
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 02:39:38AM +0100, Ivan Roth wrote:
no, I don't think so. I read carefully the handbook's section and I
quote it:
I said to read the comments in the GENERIC kernel, not the handbook.
e.g. if you commented out SCSI support, you probably left in t
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 02:39:38AM +0100, Ivan Roth wrote:
> no, I don't think so. I read carefully the handbook's section and I
> quote it:
I said to read the comments in the GENERIC kernel, not the handbook.
e.g. if you commented out SCSI support, you probably left in the USB
mass storage devi
no, I don't think so. I read carefully the handbook's section and I
quote it:
SCSI controllers. Comment out any you do not have in your system. If you
have an IDE only system, you can remove these altogether.
SCSI peripherals. Again, comment out any you do not have, or if you have only
IDE
har
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 01:23:16AM +0100, Ivan Roth wrote:
> I got problems when trying to compile my new kernel on 5.3-release. I
> didn't go to stable yet cause I never did it (really new to unix...) and
> I heard that it was better to customize the system first (?).
> But when I put a # before
I just try it again cause I didn't want to annoy anybody and it worked! (?)
I left the SCSI lines cause I use an iPod (and it seems to be an SCSI
drive inside).
I commented all the RAID lines and compilation succeeded.
Now can you tell me how to be sure that my kernel conf is optimized? I
attach
I got problems when trying to compile my new kernel on 5.3-release. I
didn't go to stable yet cause I never did it (really new to unix...) and
I heard that it was better to customize the system first (?).
But when I put a # before lines I don't need like all RAID and SCSI
options, kernel don't w
On Friday 09 August 2002 04:28 pm, Bob M. wrote:
| I also get the "SMP: AP CPU
| #1 Launched! message at the end.
: I'm new to
| FreeBSD, but I figured if I get one boot mesg that looks like it detects
| and launches both cpu's at the beginning and one that says #1 CPU launched
| and never men
On Sunday 06 January 2002 10:28 am, parv wrote:
> hi,
>
> i cvsup'd old sources (4-stable oct 13 2001) to current (4-stable
> 2002.01.05.15.45.19). at this point i am stuck at errors w/
> linux_proto.h -- which had been reported at least since nov. 2001
> to this month.
>
> first i ran make clea
The UPDATING instructions also didn't work for me, though I did this
over a month ago. I seem to recall that
rm -rf /usr/src/sys/modules/linux /usr/src/sys/compat/linux
followed by a cvsup; make buildworld && make buildkernel got things
going again. A bit of a sledgehammer, I admit.
jay
p
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Brian T. Schellenberger thusly...
>
> On Sunday 06 January 2002 10:28 am, parv wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > i cvsup'd old sources (4-stable oct 13 2001) to current (4-stable
> > 2002.01.05.15.45.19). at this point i am stuck at errors w/
> > linux_proto.h
...
> >
I have been told these can be caused by cable problems or even other
things on the pci bus so the data just didnt get through with a correct
crc. I think my troubles started when I reorganized some drives, and went
away when I used an 80 pin cable for the affected drive. The drive was
only ata33
I have been told these can be caused by cable problems or even other
things on the pci bus so the data just didnt get through with a correct
crc. I think my troubles started when I reorganized some drives, and went
away when I used an 80 pin cable for the affected drive. The drive was
only ata33
Hi!
The result of the 'file' command on the generated core file (if any)
would help knowing which tool really segfault!
Phil.
On 18 Aug, Greg Prosser wrote:
> Is it the compiler or make that is segfaulting?
>
> Better phrasing: Do any other system binaries segfault? Is there a
> noticeable pat
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Francisco Reyes" writes:
: For one they are missing the references about genassym.
No. They aren't. You don't need to build genassym. Buildkernel
takes care of all of that.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Francisco Reyes" writes:
: clarification... I mean to say if someone would send-prg to
: update /usr/src/UPDATING.
What update is needed? The instructions worked fine for me last time
I tried it?
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsu
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Francisco Reyes" writes:
: Would someone please send-pr the current instructsions to go
: from 3.4 to 4.X Stable.
cvsup
cat /usr/src/UPDATING
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Joe Royce writes:
: An alternative method of building a kernel is:
:
: cd /usr/src/usr.bin/genassym
: make depend all install clean
: cd ../../usr.sbin/config
: make depend all install clean
: cd ../../sys/i386/conf
: config YOUR_KERNEL_HERE
: cd ../../compile/YOUR_
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Francisco Reyes" writes:
: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.4" not found
UPDATING says:
[5] If you get warnings from ld-elf.so that it cannot load
libc.so, run 'ldconfig -R /usr/obj/usr/src/lib/libc' and repeat
the installwor
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Francisco Reyes" writes:
: When I get to the point of building the kernel I get a number
: of syntax errors and the last line reports:
did you accidentally update to -current where lots of things changed?
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 07:27:01AM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Following the instructions from UPDATING.
> When I get to the point of building the kernel I get a number
> of syntax errors and the last line reports:
>
> Specify machine type, e.g. ``machine vax''
>
> I tried to put single and
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> When I get to the point of building the kernel I get a number
> of syntax errors and the last line reports:
>
> Specify machine type, e.g. ``machine vax''
I got this when I accidently cvsuped 3-STABLE rather than 4-STABLE on a
4.0-RELEASE box. Hav
26 matches
Mail list logo
