Chris H. wrote:
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mike Lempriere wrote:
I've had it with the list spam -- is the any possibility of
moderating this list, or changing it to must-be-subscriber-to-post?
I have the opposite experience. I am amazed at how littl
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mike Lempriere wrote:
I've had it with the list spam -- is the any possibility of
moderating this list, or changing it to must-be-subscriber-to-post?
I have the opposite experience. I am amazed at how little spam this
lis
Hi Oliver Fromme!
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:33:37 +0100 (CET); Oliver Fromme wrote about 'Re: list
spam':
>>>> I've had it with the list spam -- is the any possibility of moderating
>>>> this
>>>> list, or changing it to must-be-subscri
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008, Mike Lempriere wrote:
I've had it with the list spam -- is the any possibility of moderating this
list, or changing it to must-be-subscriber-to-post?
I have a humble suggestion that perhaps the FreeBSD Foundation could
handle... Seeing as Cisco recently bought a co
That's all that I could ask -- I'll shut up now.
Bill Campbell wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008, Peter Wemm wrote:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Mike Lempriere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've had it with the list spam -- is the any possibility of moderating
this li
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008, Peter Wemm wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Mike Lempriere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've had it with the list spam -- is the any possibility of moderating
>> this list, or changing it to must-be-subscriber-to-post?
>
>I for one wou
Sorry,
I mistakenly replied this to the list instead of only forwarding it to
sympa authors, and I'm sorry about that.
IMHO, sympa can be an interesting alternative to solve this problem, as
it includes all features of mailman (and much more)..., but surely
implies changing the MLM.
Either way,
Mike Lempriere wrote:
I've had it with the list spam -- is the any possibility of moderating
this list, or changing it to must-be-subscriber-to-post?
I have the opposite experience. I am amazed at how little spam this
list gets. So far today, only one piece of spam - from the ports
Robert Watson wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Mar 2008, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Mike Lempriere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I've had it with the list spam -- is the any possibility of moderating
> > > this
> > > lis
uc du genre...
Robert Watson wrote:
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008, Peter Wemm wrote:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Mike Lempriere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've had it with the list spam -- is the any possibility of
moderating this list, or changing it to must-be-subscriber-to-post?
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008, Peter Wemm wrote:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Mike Lempriere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've had it with the list spam -- is the any possibility of moderating this
list, or changing it to must-be-subscriber-to-post?
I for one would like this too.
On one
Peter Wemm wrote:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Mike Lempriere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've had it with the list spam -- is the any possibility of moderating
this list, or changing it to must-be-subscriber-to-post?
I for one would like this too.
On one hand, it is incon
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Mike Lempriere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've had it with the list spam -- is the any possibility of moderating
> this list, or changing it to must-be-subscriber-to-post?
I for one would like this too.
On one hand, it is inconvenient for peo
I've had it with the list spam -- is the any possibility of moderating
this list, or changing it to must-be-subscriber-to-post?
--
Mike Lempriere- Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 206-780-2146
Cellphone: 206-200-5902; text pager: [EMAIL PROT
14 matches
Mail list logo
