On 12 October 2012 11:10, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote: > I don't like comparing Release Candidates without any details about config, > but the fact that DF 3.2 is much better than DF 3.0 is interesting. And they > are very close to performance of Scientific Linux 6.2.
Hey cool! And FreeBSD-9.1 is on there and doing worse than Linux and Dragonfly BSD. I wonder why that is. Lemme cross post this a little to see what people think. > http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2012-October/017536.html > > Graphs are available as PDF attachments > > http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121010/7996ff88/attachment-0002.pdf > > http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121010/7996ff88/attachment-0003.pdf Adrian _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
