I'm happy to say that the packet loss I experienced with re(4) on
6.3-RELEASE has been fixed by a patch provided off list by
Pyun YongHyeon.
I'm also happy to report that the same hardware does not
exhibit any re(4) problems with 7.0-RELEASE.
ref:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:18:26 +0100
Torfinn Ingolfsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After the last update, I saw that there had been a lot of fixes for re
(4) in the source, so I didn't bother with this patch.The machine is
still up, but I haven't tried any heavy network traffic yet.
Note to self
Hello Pyun,
Monday, February 25, 2008, 3:01:23 AM, you wrote:
Perhaps the recent MFC's for re helps?
see
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/re/if_re.c
I have just upgraded my machine[1] to the latest 7-stable,so it is still
too early to tell if re(4) is stable now.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:22:51AM +0100, Daniel Gerzo wrote:
Hello Pyun,
Monday, February 25, 2008, 3:01:23 AM, you wrote:
Perhaps the recent MFC's for re helps?
see
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/re/if_re.c
I have just upgraded my machine[1] to
Unfortunately 7-stable does not have latest fixes for re(4).
For 7-stable or 7.0-RELEASE use the following files.
http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/7.0R/if_re.c
http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/7.0R/if_rlreg.h
Ah, thats is very interesting - I have an identical motherboard to
Tor,
Hi!
Everybody, I *am* subscribed to the list, there is no need to CC me at
all. Doing sio just clutters up my mail sorting. :-)
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:50:09 +
Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, thats is very interesting - I have an identical motherboard to
Tor, and am also having
I couldn't see anyone lese in this thread whos name starts with Tor...
so I guess you were adressing me.
Ah, yes, sorry, not quite sure how I lost the end of your name there!
I used this patch http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/re.HEAD.patch
and it worled well for me.
Thanks for this,
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 11:55:06PM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:44:49 -0500
Dan Langille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE, I'm finding significant packet loss
(sometimes 85%).
If I insert an Intel nic (fxp), there is nil packet loss with
With FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE, I'm finding significant packet loss
(sometimes 85%).
If I insert an Intel nic (fxp), there is nil packet loss with similar
tests (ping -c 100).
re0: RealTek 8168/8111B PCIe Gigabit Ethernet port 0xc800-0xc8ff
mem 0xf9fff000-0xf9ff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci1
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:44:49 -0500
Dan Langille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE, I'm finding significant packet loss
(sometimes 85%).
If I insert an Intel nic (fxp), there is nil packet loss with
similar tests (ping -c 100).
Perhaps the recent MFC's for re helps?
see
10 matches
Mail list logo