I didn't think this routing patch was related to the bad neighbor solicitation
messages as suggested in the subject field but I tried it anyway. It does not
fix my IPv6 problem. I still get bad neighbor solicitation messages and
freebsd 8 doesn't respond to 4/5 IPv6 pings.
Thanks,
Tom
On Dec
-...@freebsd.org; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: patch: bad ipv6 neighbor solicitation
I didn't think this routing patch was related to the bad neighbor
solicitation messages as suggested in the subject field but I tried
it
anyway. It does not fix my IPv6 problem. I still get bad neighbor
...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Li, Qing
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:46 PM
To: Tom Pusateri
Cc: freebsd-...@freebsd.org; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: patch: bad ipv6 neighbor solicitation
Thanks for reporting back. I asked you for a routing table dump
in my previous email, would you mind
; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: patch: bad ipv6 neighbor solicitation
Thanks for reporting back. I asked you for a routing table dump
in my previous email, would you mind emailing it to me privately?
-- Qing
-Original Message-
From: Tom Pusateri [mailto:pusat
This patch works for me.
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Li, Qing wrote:
Please find the more proper fix at
http://people.freebsd.org/~qingli/nd6-patch.diff
I realized I was slightly off in my previous email after
I spent a bit more time looking through the problem.
Both prefixes are present
Please find the more proper fix at
http://people.freebsd.org/~qingli/nd6-patch.diff
I realized I was slightly off in my previous email after
I spent a bit more time looking through the problem.
Both prefixes are present but one was marked off-link due
to the fact only a single prefix
