On 25 August 2011 18:54, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 24 August 2011 16:14, wrote:
>>> When the specified or calculated rate exceeds 64KB/sec, the
>>> required sleep interval between 64KB chunks is less than one
>>> second. Since diskcheckd calculates the interval in whole seconds
>>> -- because it c
On 24 August 2011 16:14, wrote:
>> When the specified or calculated rate exceeds 64KB/sec, the
>> required sleep interval between 64KB chunks is less than one
>> second. Since diskcheckd calculates the interval in whole seconds
>> -- because it calls sleep() rather than usleep() or nanosleep()
>
> When the specified or calculated rate exceeds 64KB/sec, the
> required sleep interval between 64KB chunks is less than one
> second. Since diskcheckd calculates the interval in whole seconds
> -- because it calls sleep() rather than usleep() or nanosleep()
> -- an interval of less than one secon
