On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 02:24:42PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 2/8/2016 4:10 AM, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 07:46:02PM -0500, mike tancsa wrote:
> >> Sure, I will try Monday when at the office
> >
> > Actually, thinking about it, could you please try the following
> > patc
On 2/8/2016 4:10 AM, Marius Strobl wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 07:46:02PM -0500, mike tancsa wrote:
>> Sure, I will try Monday when at the office
>
> Actually, thinking about it, could you please try the following
> patch on top of the previous one/r295287?
> https://people.freebsd.org/~mariu
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 07:46:02PM -0500, mike tancsa wrote:
> Sure, I will try Monday when at the office
Actually, thinking about it, could you please try the following
patch on top of the previous one/r295287?
https://people.freebsd.org/~marius/e1000_max_scatter_tso_10.diff
Thanks
Marius
_
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:49:59AM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 1/30/2016 12:26 PM, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 11:47:19AM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> >> On 1/29/2016 8:23 PM, Marius Strobl wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 03:41:57PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> >>>
On 2/1/2016 5:27 PM, Marius Strobl wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 05:11:29PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>> On 1/30/2016 12:26 PM, Marius Strobl wrote:
>>>
>>> Ah, okay, that at least makes sense. Can you please verify that with
>>> the attached patch applied, you have a setup that works out of the
On 1/30/2016 12:26 PM, Marius Strobl wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 11:47:19AM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>> On 1/29/2016 8:23 PM, Marius Strobl wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 03:41:57PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
No multi queue. Stock GENERIC kernel with a couple of things removed.
>
On 2/1/2016 5:27 PM, Marius Strobl wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 05:11:29PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>> On 1/30/2016 12:26 PM, Marius Strobl wrote:
>>>
>>> Ah, okay, that at least makes sense. Can you please verify that with
>>> the attached patch applied, you have a setup that works out of the
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 05:11:29PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 1/30/2016 12:26 PM, Marius Strobl wrote:
> >
> > Ah, okay, that at least makes sense. Can you please verify that with
> > the attached patch applied, you have a setup that works out of the
> > box?
> >
> Hi,
> The patch does not ap
On 1/30/2016 12:26 PM, Marius Strobl wrote:
>
> Ah, okay, that at least makes sense. Can you please verify that with
> the attached patch applied, you have a setup that works out of the
> box?
>
Hi,
The patch does not apply cleanly
# patch < em_tso_gig_only_10.diff
Hmm... Looks like a unified
Thanks, I will apply and try it early Monday morning !
On January 30, 2016 12:26:31 PM Marius Strobl
wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 11:47:19AM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
On 1/29/2016 8:23 PM, Marius Strobl wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 03:41:57PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>>
>> No multi
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 11:47:19AM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 1/29/2016 8:23 PM, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 03:41:57PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> >>
> >> No multi queue. Stock GENERIC kernel with a couple of things removed.
> >> hw.em are just the defaults. I will try wit
On 1/29/2016 8:23 PM, Marius Strobl wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 03:41:57PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>>
>> No multi queue. Stock GENERIC kernel with a couple of things removed.
>> hw.em are just the defaults. I will try without TSO
>>
>> % ifconfig em0
>> em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
>>
>
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 03:41:57PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> No multi queue. Stock GENERIC kernel with a couple of things removed.
> hw.em are just the defaults. I will try without TSO
>
> % ifconfig em0
> em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
>
> options=4209b
>
Hrm, that's strange, TSO4 shou
On 1/29/2016 1:42 PM, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
>> # pciconf -lBvcb em0
>> em0@pci0:13:0:0:class=0x02 card=0x108c15d9 chip=0x108c8086
>> rev=0x03 hdr=0x00
>> vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
>> device = '82573E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper)'
>
> I guess you haven't c
14 matches
Mail list logo