On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, Wyness Casama wrote:
> >>I'm having a little trouble with my procfs... actually, it seems
> >>it's a little too small (4k) for what I'm doing. Is it possible
> >>to resize the procfs to say: 1mb+?
>
> >procfs isn't an ordinary file system; it's a projection of system
> >mem
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wyness Casama
> Thanks for the info. :) I was thinking about the size of procfs (4k) I'm
> trying to increase that memory space cause the procfs is always
> full... I'm
> not too sure why, but it's p
On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, Wyness Casama wrote:
> Thanks for the info. :) I was thinking about the size of procfs (4k) I'm
> trying to increase that memory space cause the procfs is always full... I'm
> not too sure why, but it's preventimg me from even running 'top' or
> anything.
procfs is alw
>>>I'm having a little trouble with my procfs... actually, it seems it's a
>>>little too small (4k) for what I'm doing. Is it possible to resize the
>>>procfs to say: 1mb+?
>>procfs isn't an ordinary file system; it's a projection of system memory
>into
>>the file system hierarchy. You never ac
>>I'm having a little trouble with my procfs... actually, it seems it's a
>>little too small (4k) for what I'm doing. Is it possible to resize the
>>procfs to say: 1mb+?
>procfs isn't an ordinary file system; it's a projection of system memory
into
>the file system hierarchy. You never actually
>I'm having a little trouble with my procfs... actually, it seems it's a
>little too small (4k) for what I'm doing. Is it possible to resize the
>procfs to say: 1mb+?
procfs isn't an ordinary file system; it's a projection of system memory into
the file system hierarchy. You never actually put
