Some quite lively offline discussion has come to conclusion with the
following suggestions to change the support policy. Obviously, this
is what we feel would be a good idea, but it's obviously open to
discussion and there's nobody demanding anything here. It just seems
"better".
Old te
freebsd-stable et al ...
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 01:37:03PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
> Some quite lively offline discussion has come to conclusion with the
> following suggestions to change the support policy. Obviously, this
> is what we feel would be a good idea, but it's obviously open to
jonathan michaels wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 01:37:03PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
Some quite lively offline discussion has come to conclusion with the
following suggestions to change the support policy. Obviously, this
is what we feel would be a good idea, but it's obviously open to
discu
On Sep 23, 2008, at 4:45 PM, Colin Percival wrote:
jonathan michaels wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 01:37:03PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
Some quite lively offline discussion has come to conclusion with
the following suggestions to change the support policy.
Obviously, this is what we feel wo
Jo Rhett wrote:
Some quite lively offline discussion has come to conclusion with the
following suggestions to change the support policy. Obviously, this is
what we feel would be a good idea, but it's obviously open to
discussion and there's nobody demanding anything here. It just seems
"
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 13:37 -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
> Some quite lively offline discussion has come to conclusion with the
> following suggestions to change the support policy. Obviously, this
> is what we feel would be a good idea, but it's obviously open to
> discussion and there's nobody d
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 13:37 -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
Normal
Releases which are published from a -STABLE branch will be
supported by the Security Officer for a minimum of 12 months after
the
release.
A release which is not the final minor release of a branch will
be additionally supported
Jo Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Each branch is supported by the Security Officer for a limited time
> only, and is designated as one of `Early adopter', `Normal', or
> Final'. The designation is used as a guideline for determining the
> lifetime of the branch as follows.
I'm not clear on h
On Sep 25, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
I'm not clear on how this helps. We don't know if there will be a
need to produce a 6.5 release, so there's no way to judge whether 6.4
should be designated "final" or not. The only logical answer is to do
so, which leaves a substantial chance
Hi, Colin. Any news/thoughts on where we are with this?
--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source
and other randomness
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
10 matches
Mail list logo
