Jeff,
On 15 aug 2009, at 05:04, Jeff Richards wrote:
(da6:umass-sim6:6:0:0): SYNCHRONIZE CACHE(10). CDB: 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
...
I've had lots of stability issues with USB drives until I added some
quirks to prevent the SYNCHRONIZE CACHE from happening. For example:
Index:
Is there a practical limit on the number of active USB drives with FreeBSD?
I've had stability issues using multiple USB drives as storage.
My initial design goal was cheap, hot-swappable storage. I am only using a
100MB network currently so throughput on the storage is not a problem as I
.
GEOM_LABEL: Label ufsid/49273a95d669d784 removed.
fuse4bsd: version 0.3.9-pre1, FUSE ABI 7.8
GEOM_LABEL: Label ufsid/4a509cddbd500a7e removed.
--- On Fri, 8/14/09, Jeff Richards bsd2...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Jeff Richards bsd2...@yahoo.com
Subject: Multiple USB drives stability question
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:24:20PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
snip
Thank you very much indeed, Roland, for your explanation.
Harald
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe,
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 06:01:01AM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 06:35:04PM -0400, Gary Palmer wrote:
I am not the OP, however I also ran into warnings about mplayer and
linux-pango. I believe the problem comes from linux-realplayer
# cd
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 06:01:01AM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
Good catch! I think that is indeed the problem. I disabled realplayer
support for mplayer ages ago, so it doesn't show up in my list.
How do you do that precisely ?
``WITH_REALPLAYER=no'' in /etc/make.conf ?
Thanks
Harald
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:14:37 +0200
From: Harald Weis ha...@free.fr
Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 06:01:01AM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
Good catch! I think that is indeed the problem. I disabled realplayer
support for mplayer ages ago, so it doesn't
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 10:00:12AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Good catch! I think that is indeed the problem. I disabled realplayer
support for mplayer ages ago, so it doesn't show up in my list.
How do you do that precisely ?
``WITH_REALPLAYER=no'' in /etc/make.conf ?
cd
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:05:28PM +0200, Harald Weis wrote:
How do you do that precisely ?
``WITH_REALPLAYER=no'' in /etc/make.conf ?
cd /us/ports/multimedia/mplayer
make config
Scroll down to the REALPLAYER Enable real player plugin line
SPACE to un-check the line
TABENTER
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:40:52PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:56:54PM +0200, Harald Weis wrote:
Building lxdvdrip stops because linux-pango has known
vulnerabilities.
You can ignore vulnerabilities by setting the environment variable
DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES. See
it doesn't help you with your specific problem. Ever took a look
into handbrake? Handbrake is a fine dvd ripper. Although I couldn't answer
the question about burning the rip afterwards.
But give handbrake a try :)
Cheers,
Marian
___
freebsd-stable
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 05:08:32PM +0200, Harald Weis wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:40:52PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:56:54PM +0200, Harald Weis wrote:
Building lxdvdrip stops because linux-pango has known
vulnerabilities.
You can ignore
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 07:32:37PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 05:08:32PM +0200, Harald Weis wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:40:52PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:56:54PM +0200, Harald Weis wrote:
Building lxdvdrip stops because
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 06:35:04PM -0400, Gary Palmer wrote:
Are you running a linux binary of mplayer? Because a native mplayer
binary does not require linux-pango! It just uses the native pango.
In fact, it's lxdvdrip which requires linux-pango [via linux-gtk2].
lxdvdrip is
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:56:54PM +0200, Harald Weis wrote:
Building lxdvdrip stops because linux-pango has known
vulnerabilities.
You can ignore vulnerabilities by setting the environment variable
DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES. See ports(7).
Is there a risk if mplayer (which requires linux-pango)
Building lxdvdrip stops because linux-pango has known
vulnerabilities.
Is there a risk if mplayer (which requires linux-pango)
is only used locally by lxdvdrip, but never on-line
by firefox which would not use any mplayer plugin ?
For example I could easily control this with mozplugger.
Thank you
Hello,
I'm trying to replace our current firewall (clavister) with freebsd/pf.
I'm almost done but I have some rules I don't know how to convert. I've
tried googling around but I've found nothing useful (maybe I'm looking
for the wrong terms).
I have the following scenario:
LAN
Dan Naumov wrote:
Anyone else think that this combined with freebsd-update integration
and a simplistic menu GUI for choosing the preferred boot environment
would make an _awesome_ addition to the base system? :)
I guess freebsd-update is not a problem, should be freebsd-update -b
Dan Naumov wrote:
Reading that made me pause for a second and made me go WOW, this is how
UNIX system upgrades should be done. Any hope of us lowly users ever seeing
something like this implemented in FreeBSD? :)
I wrote a script implementing the most useful features of the solaris
live
Anyone else think that this combined with freebsd-update integration
and a simplistic menu GUI for choosing the preferred boot environment
would make an _awesome_ addition to the base system? :)
- Dan Naumov
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Philipp Wuenschecryx-free...@h3q.com wrote:
I wrote a
On Sat, 30 May 2009 21:41:36 +0300 Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote
about ZFS NAS configuration question:
DN So, this leaves me with 1 SATA port used for a FreeBSD disk and 4 SATA
DN ports available for tinketing with ZFS.
Do you have a USB port available to boot from? A conventional USB
having to setup some crazy GEOM mirror setup using 2 of them?
- Dan Naumov
2009/6/2 Gerrit Kühn ger...@pmp.uni-hannover.de
On Sat, 30 May 2009 21:41:36 +0300 Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote
about ZFS NAS configuration question:
DN So, this leaves me with 1 SATA port used for a FreeBSD
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Dan Naumov wrote:
USB root partition for booting off UFS is something I have
considered. I have looked around and it seems that all the install
FreeBSD onto USB stick guides seem to involve a lot of manual work
from a fixit environment, does sysinstall not recognise USB
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Dan Naumov wrote:
USB root partition for booting off UFS is something I have
considered. I have looked around and it seems that all the install
FreeBSD onto USB stick guides seem to involve a lot of manual work
from a fixit environment, does
root filesystem is remounted read write only for some configuration
changes, then remounted back to read only.
Does this work reliably for you? I tried doing the remounting trick,
both for root and /usr, back in the 4.x time frame. And could never
get it to work - would always end up with
sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
root filesystem is remounted read write only for some configuration
changes, then remounted back to read only.
Does this work reliably for you? I tried doing the remounting trick,
both for root and /usr, back in the 4.x time frame. And could never
get it to work -
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Aristedes Maniatis a...@ish.com.au wrote:
On 31/05/2009, at 4:41 AM, Dan Naumov wrote:
To top that
off, even when/if you do it right, not your entire disk goes to ZFS
anyway, because you still do need a swap and a /boot to be non-ZFS, so
you will have to
sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
root filesystem is remounted read write only for some configuration
changes, then remounted back to read only.
Does this work reliably for you? I tried doing the remounting trick,
both for root and /usr, back in the 4.x time frame. And could never
get it to work -
This reminds me. I was reading the release and upgrade notes of OpenSolaris
2009.6 and noted one thing about upgrading from a previous version to the
new one::
When you pick the upgrade OS option in the OpenSolaris installer, it will
check if you are using a ZFS root partition and if you do, it
A little more info for the (perhaps) curious:
Managing Multiple Boot Environments:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/2009.06/getstart/bootenv.html#bootenvmgr
Introduction to Boot Environments:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/2009.06/snapupgrade/index.html
- Dan Naumov
On Tue, Jun 2,
I have a proof of concept system doing this. I started with a 7.2
install on zfs root, compiled world and kernel from 8, took a snapshot
and made a clone for the 7.2 install, and proceeded to upgrade the
current fs to 8.0. After updating the loader.conf in the 7.2 zfs to
point to its own
On 31/05/2009, at 4:41 AM, Dan Naumov wrote:
To top that
off, even when/if you do it right, not your entire disk goes to ZFS
anyway, because you still do need a swap and a /boot to be non-ZFS, so
you will have to install ZFS onto a slice and not the entire disk and
even SUN discourages to do
Hey
I am not entirely sure if this question belongs here or to another
list, so feel free to direct me elsewhere :)
Anyways, I am trying to figure out the best way to configure a NAS
system I will soon get my hands on, it's a Tranquil BBS2 (
http://www.tranquilpc-shop.co.uk/acatalog
environment to debug from, if necessary, rather than just a /boot.
Just some ideas..
louie
On May 30, 2009, at 2:41 PM, Dan Naumov wrote:
Hey
I am not entirely sure if this question belongs here or to another
list, so feel free to direct me elsewhere :)
Anyways, I am trying to figure out the best
Is the idea behind leaving 1GB unused on each disk to work around the
problem of potentially being unable to replace a failed device in a
ZFS pool because a 1TB replacement you bought actually has a lower
sector count than your previous 1TB drive (since the replacement
device has to be either of
The system that I built had 5 x 72GB SCA SCSI drives. Just to keep my
own sanity, I decided that I'd configure the fdisk partitioning
identically
across all of the drives. So that they all have a 1GB slice and and a
71GB
slice.
The drives all have identical capacity, so the second 71GB
Howdy!
Amd64, 7.1.
Few days ago I replaced dieing dvd writer with brand
new pioneer 116d. In the kernel I removed all not
needed stuff and included atapicam and both cd and
acd. Previously I used cd only with no hiss. Making
dvd I first encountered error at the very beginning
of the whole process:
Hello,
I set up a second routingtable and told rc.d/jail to use the FIB1.
Now I wonder why the SSHd in the jail isn't responding. I set the
default router to a local address and the second default router in FIB1
to the ISP router, reachable via a second NIC.
Does the FIb only work for
on 28/02/2009 16:34 Kostik Belousov said the following:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 02:13:10PM +0100, Michael Sperber wrote:
I'm trying to make devd run an stty command whenever a USB serial device
is attached. Unfortunately, $device-name is ucom[0-9] and the device
names are /dev/cuaU[0-9] - how
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 03:23:46PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 28/02/2009 16:34 Kostik Belousov said the following:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 02:13:10PM +0100, Michael Sperber wrote:
I'm trying to make devd run an stty command whenever a USB serial device
is attached. Unfortunately,
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 07:28:39PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 03:23:46PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 28/02/2009 16:34 Kostik Belousov said the following:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 02:13:10PM +0100, Michael Sperber wrote:
I'm trying to make devd run an stty command
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 08:48:53PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
snip
This system is missing from the devd.conf manual page, nor is DEVFS
mentioned in /usr/share/examples/etc/devd.conf. Is it documented
somewhere else?
No, it is not documented anywhere.
Feel free to send me the
I'm trying to make devd run an stty command whenever a USB serial device
is attached. Unfortunately, $device-name is ucom[0-9] and the device
names are /dev/cuaU[0-9] - how do I get the correct name in the device
action? I haven't found a way to extract the number by itself, so I'm
stuck with
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 02:13:10PM +0100, Michael Sperber wrote:
I'm trying to make devd run an stty command whenever a USB serial device
is attached. Unfortunately, $device-name is ucom[0-9] and the device
names are /dev/cuaU[0-9] - how do I get the correct name in the device
action? I
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 01:47:07AM -0500, Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
Hi, Luigi and Fabio:
I have a question about the GEOM disk scheduler you announed a while ago.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2009-January/047597.html
Can you tell me how does the scheduler interact
Hi, Luigi and Fabio:
I have a question about the GEOM disk scheduler you announed a while ago.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2009-January/047597.html
Can you tell me how does the scheduler interact with gjournal?
Do you expect to improve response time even if used together
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, lhmwzy wrote:
The fllow is better?
#!/bin/sh
find $1 -type f -exec ls -lh {} \; | awk '{j += $5} END {print jM}'
Review your 'ls -lh' output; what's 100Bananas + 10Kiwifruit + 1Melon?
$ find . -type f -exec ls -lh {} \; | awk '{j += $5} END {print jM}'
1.15975e+06M
OK.It's my mistake.
Improve it again:
#!/bin/sh
find $1 -type f -ls | awk '{j += $7} END {printf(%.2fM\n,j/1024/1024)}'
2008/10/8 Ian Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, lhmwzy wrote:
The fllow is better?
#!/bin/sh
find $1 -type f -exec ls -lh {} \; | awk '{j += $5} END
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, lhmwzy wrote:
OK.It's my mistake.
Improve it again:
#!/bin/sh
find $1 -type f -ls | awk '{j += $7} END {printf(%.2fM\n,j/1024/1024)}'
Sure. Here it runs about 7% faster precalculating one division:
$ time find . -type f -ls | awk '{j += $7} END
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 12:07:26PM +0200, Holger Kipp wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:54:37AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use zfs set
quota=1m pool/lhm
I can confirm and
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:54:37AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use zfs set
quota=1m pool/lhm
#zfs get all pool/lhm
zfs get all pool/lhm
[ttyp0][5:22:12pm]
NAME
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 03:12:59AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 12:07:26PM +0200, Holger Kipp wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:54:37AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 03:30:09AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 12:17:55PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
Turn compression off and retry.
Yep, that's the key!
# zfs set quota=4g storage/home
# zfs set compression=off storage
# zfs get
I love ZFS, but I suddenly found out last night that I
have lost the ability tto do a 'du' on a directory to work out if it will
fit onto a CD or not :-)
I have created a shell script, /usr/local/bin/dirsize :
#!/bin/sh
find $1 -type f -ls | awk '{j += $7} END {print j}'
Usage: dirsize
You're right.
I turn off the compression,everything go well.
So this is my problem,not a ZFS of FreeBSD problme.
Tks for reply.
2008/10/7 Pawel Jakub Dawidek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
.00M -
pool/lhm compressratio 7.25x -
Turn compression off and retry.
sorry,I make a mistake.
It is a filesystem,not a volume.
2008/10/7 Holger Kipp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
according to zfs manpage:
Quotas cannot be set on volumes, as the volsize property acts as
an implicit quota.
___
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 12:43:45 Pete French wrote:
Yeah, ZFS offers a lot, which can create confusion, unfortunately. Do we
limit physical space with quota or only logical (before compression)?
Should we take space consumed by snapshots into account or not? etc.
On a related note, is
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use zfs set
quota=1m pool/lhm
according to zfs manpage:
Quotas cannot be set on volumes, as the volsize property acts as
an implicit quota.
Aditionally, I see
My system
#uname -a
FreeBSD bxzxfreebsd.slof.com 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #4:
Mon Oct 6 15:02:42 CST 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/lhmwzy amd64
zfs version:
ZFS filesystem version 6
ZFS storage pool version 6
___
I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use zfs set
quota=1m pool/lhm
#zfs get all pool/lhm
zfs get all pool/lhm
[ttyp0][5:22:12pm]
NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE
pool/lhm type filesystem -
pool/lhm creation Tue Oct 7 17:14 2008
Yeah, ZFS offers a lot, which can create confusion, unfortunately. Do we
limit physical space with quota or only logical (before compression)?
Should we take space consumed by snapshots into account or not? etc.
On a related note, is there any way to make du tell me how big files
are in actual
Yes,this is a problem.
In my case,du -h displays 1M,but the actual size is about 24M.
2008/10/7 Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yeah, ZFS offers a lot, which can create confusion, unfortunately. Do we
limit physical space with quota or only logical (before compression)?
Should we take space
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:54:37AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use zfs set
quota=1m pool/lhm
I can confirm and reproduce what you're seeing.
Based on all of the ZFS documentation
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 12:17:55PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:54:37AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use zfs set
quota=1m pool/lhm
#zfs get
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:32:43PM +0800, lhmwzy wrote:
I create a zfs volume pool/lhm and give it quota 1M use zfs set
quota=1m pool/lhm
#zfs get all pool/lhm
zfs get all pool/lhm
[ttyp0][5:22:12pm]
NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE
pool/lhm type
The fllow is better?
#!/bin/sh
find $1 -type f -exec ls -lh {} \; | awk '{j += $5} END {print jM}'
2008/10/7 Andrew Snow [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I love ZFS, but I suddenly found out last night that I
have lost the ability tto do a 'du' on a directory to work out if it will
fit onto a CD or not :-)
John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 07:47:18 am Oliver Fromme wrote:
I have recently updated a machine to 7-stable.
ACPI doesn't seem to work correctly on this machine.
With earlier versions of FreeBSD (including the latest
RELENG_6), I got this line in dmesg:
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 11:44 am, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 07:47:18 am Oliver Fromme wrote:
Hello,
I have recently updated a machine to 7-stable.
ACPI doesn't seem to work correctly on this machine.
With earlier versions of FreeBSD (including the latest
On Friday 19 September 2008 10:20 am, Oliver Fromme wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 07:47:18 am Oliver Fromme wrote:
I have recently updated a machine to 7-stable.
ACPI doesn't seem to work correctly on this machine.
With earlier versions of FreeBSD
Hello,
I have recently updated a machine to 7-stable.
ACPI doesn't seem to work correctly on this machine.
With earlier versions of FreeBSD (including the latest
RELENG_6), I got this line in dmesg:
ACPI disabled by blacklist. Contact your BIOS vendor.
And everything was fine. The box runs
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 07:47:18 am Oliver Fromme wrote:
Hello,
I have recently updated a machine to 7-stable.
ACPI doesn't seem to work correctly on this machine.
With earlier versions of FreeBSD (including the latest
RELENG_6), I got this line in dmesg:
ACPI disabled by
John Baldwin wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
[...]
Now i'm wondering: Has the ACPI blacklist been removed
intentionally, or is this a regression? Certainly I did
not find any mentioning of it in UPDATING or anywhere
else.
This is a regression. Try this fix:
Index:
Greetings,
Given that the folks at PHP have decided that no one is allowed
to use PHP4 any longer. I've decided to *attempt* to install a copy
of PHP5 (cgi only) along side my already installed/configured, and
in use copy of PHP4 (apache_module, CLI, CGI). I spent some time
attempting to find
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
Given that the folks at PHP have decided that no one is allowed
to use PHP4 any longer. I've decided to *attempt* to install a copy
of PHP5 (cgi only) along side my already installed/configured, and
in use copy of PHP4 (apache_module, CLI, CGI). I spent some
Quoting Chris St Denis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
Given that the folks at PHP have decided that no one is allowed
to use PHP4 any longer. I've decided to *attempt* to install a copy
of PHP5 (cgi only) along side my already installed/configured, and
in use copy of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Chris St Denis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
Given that the folks at PHP have decided that no one is allowed
to use PHP4 any longer. I've decided to *attempt* to install a copy
of PHP5 (cgi only) along side my already
Quoting Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi--
On Aug 26, 2008, at 12:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given that the folks at PHP have decided that no one is allowed
to use PHP4 any longer. I've decided to *attempt* to install a copy
of PHP5 (cgi only) along side my already
Hi--
On Aug 26, 2008, at 12:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given that the folks at PHP have decided that no one is allowed
to use PHP4 any longer. I've decided to *attempt* to install a copy
of PHP5 (cgi only) along side my already installed/configured, and
in use copy of PHP4 (apache_module,
--On August 26, 2008 2:09:27 PM -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll have a close look at $LOCALBASE. That sounds like a good
candidate. With any luck, it'll also cover extensions, ini(s), and
related libs. :)
Please be aware that if you change ${LOCALBASE} you change it for *all*
Quoting Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--On August 26, 2008 2:09:27 PM -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll have a close look at $LOCALBASE. That sounds like a good
candidate. With any luck, it'll also cover extensions, ini(s), and
related libs. :)
Please be aware that if you change
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--On August 26, 2008 2:09:27 PM -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll have a close look at $LOCALBASE. That sounds like a good
candidate. With any luck, it'll also cover extensions, ini(s), and
related libs. :)
Please be
--On August 26, 2008 3:05:25 PM -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, and thank you very much for your reply.
Yes. After looking closely at the variable, I discovered that also.
So I used the PREFIX=/usr/local/php5. But as I build it (via
php5-extensions)
I am not seeing the PREFIX variable
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 06:04:36PM -0500 I heard the voice of
Paul Schmehl, and lo! it spake thus:
If you plan on doing this often, pkgtools.conf is your best bet. If you
plan on doing it once, commandline is probably the easiest and quickest.
I would say using ports-mgmt/portconf would be
Quoting Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--On August 26, 2008 3:05:25 PM -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, and thank you very much for your reply.
Yes. After looking closely at the variable, I discovered that also.
So I used the PREFIX=/usr/local/php5. But as I build it (via
Quoting Matthew D. Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 06:04:36PM -0500 I heard the voice of
Paul Schmehl, and lo! it spake thus:
If you plan on doing this often, pkgtools.conf is your best bet. If you
plan on doing it once, commandline is probably the easiest and quickest.
I
Hi
Could I know on i386 RELENG_7, what Makefiles install following header files:
1) /usr/include/bsnmp/snmpmod.h
2) /usr/include/bsnmp/snmp_mibII.h
3) /usr/include/bsnmp/snmp_atm.h
Appreciate your reply very much.
Kind regards
Unga
___
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 03:22:21AM -0700, Unga wrote:
1) /usr/include/bsnmp/snmpmod.h
/usr/src/usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/Makefile
2) /usr/include/bsnmp/snmp_mibII.h
/usr/src/usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/snmp_mibII/Makefile
3) /usr/include/bsnmp/snmp_atm.h
Hi. I have configured sshd in OpenBSD to require publickey authentication.
I've tried configuring FreeBSD to do the same, but I can still login via
keyboard authentication.
Here are the options I have in my sshd_config:
PasswordAuthentication no
ChallengeResponseAuthentication no
UsePAM no
On 2008 Jun 29, at 19:22, Jeff Richards wrote:
After setting those options I kill -HUP the sshd process.
I thought sshd ignored SIGHUP and you had to actually stop and restart
it to pick up configuration changes.
--
brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] [EMAIL
On Sunday 29 June 2008 23:55:25 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On 2008 Jun 29, at 19:22, Jeff Richards wrote:
After setting those options I kill -HUP the sshd process.
I thought sshd ignored SIGHUP and you had to actually stop and restart
it to pick up configuration changes.
IIRC, I use
I have started experimenting with gjournal filesystems this weekend. I found
something that may be a mistake I made. Not sure.
To break up my IDE drive into the filesystems I wanted I created multiple
slices. On slice 2 I had multiple gjournal filesystems. I tried creating a
journal on
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 02:54:57AM +, Pollywog wrote:
On Sunday 29 June 2008 23:55:25 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On 2008 Jun 29, at 19:22, Jeff Richards wrote:
After setting those options I kill -HUP the sshd process.
I thought sshd ignored SIGHUP and you had to actually stop
Hi Jeremy,
I noticed that most all of the files in my old /etc/rc.d had 555
permissions. There were 4 or 5 that had 644 permissions in my old
/etc/rc.d. What I am wondering is if all the files in rc.d should be
555? So far I am not experiencing any problems with anything with a
very few 644
(kern/114438 btw)
--
Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst
http://hur.st/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have disks on the internal ICH7 adapters (on the motherboard), SATA,
and also a TWE controller with two disks.
When hitting the TWE controller hard I can hose the I/O performance on
the primary (onboard) adapter quite severely to the point that
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:33:16AM +0100, Thomas Hurst wrote:
* Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have disks on the internal ICH7 adapters (on the motherboard), SATA,
and also a TWE controller with two disks.
When hitting the TWE controller hard I can hose the I/O performance
in question is a quad-core - here's the boot info
Copyright (c) 1992-2008 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD
On Friday 28 March 2008 16:26:16 Ivan Voras wrote:
All were tested within the same time: 50 seconds. Details: the machine
being tested was connected to a reporter machine via plain crossover
cable, the reporter had a TCP server and the tested machine had a TCP
client that run a tight loop of
2008/4/6 Momchil Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think that if you did different set of operations in the different test
cases, you cannot compare the results. I think first you have to generate
your random set of operations and then perform all test cases with it. After
performing tests with
Ivan Voras wrote:
Danny Pansters wrote:
Generally I can say that with freebsd even if you pull the plug and
then let it reboot and do the automatical background fsck you'll
likely loose only that one file you might have been editing while (or
just before) you unplugged the box.
Stress
301 - 400 of 903 matches
Mail list logo
