setfacl man page states d=delete_child and D=delete

2013-02-08 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Hello, I think there's a confusion in the man page setfacl(1). In my tests, D means delete_child and d delete; like it's true for other NFSv4 implementations. But manpage tells the other way around. Since things didn't work as expected when I followed the man page I checked the following as a

Re: setfacl man page states d=delete_child and D=delete

2013-02-08 Thread Edward Tomasz Napierała
Wiadomość napisana przez Harald Schmalzbauer w dniu 8 lut 2013, o godz. 16:08: Hello, I think there's a confusion in the man page setfacl(1). In my tests, D means delete_child and d delete; like it's true for other NFSv4 implementations. But manpage tells the other way around. Fixed the

Re: setfacl man page states d=delete_child and D=delete

2013-02-08 Thread Eitan Adler
On 8 February 2013 13:46, Edward Tomasz Napierała tr...@freebsd.org wrote: Wiadomość napisana przez Harald Schmalzbauer w dniu 8 lut 2013, o godz. 16:08: Hello, I think there's a confusion in the man page setfacl(1). In my tests, D means delete_child and d delete; like it's true for other

Re: setfacl man page states d=delete_child and D=delete

2013-02-08 Thread Edward Tomasz Napierała
Wiadomość napisana przez Eitan Adler w dniu 8 lut 2013, o godz. 20:05: On 8 February 2013 13:46, Edward Tomasz Napierała tr...@freebsd.org wrote: Wiadomość napisana przez Harald Schmalzbauer w dniu 8 lut 2013, o godz. 16:08: Hello, I think there's a confusion in the man page setfacl(1).

Re: setfacl man page states d=delete_child and D=delete

2013-02-08 Thread Chris Rees
On 8 February 2013 20:42, Edward Tomasz Napierała tr...@freebsd.org wrote: Wiadomość napisana przez Eitan Adler w dniu 8 lut 2013, o godz. 20:05: On 8 February 2013 13:46, Edward Tomasz Napierała tr...@freebsd.org wrote: Wiadomość napisana przez Harald Schmalzbauer w dniu 8 lut 2013, o godz.