Chris BeHanna wrote:
On Tuesday 18 March 2003 15:46, Brian Szymanski wrote:
On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 12:28, Brian Szymanski wrote:
Raising the maximum number of groups requires changes all over the
place; even if you find them all and rebuild the world (yes, libc
depends on it as well) you'll find t
--On Tuesday, March 18, 2003 15:46:29 -0500 Brian Szymanski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Which brings up another question. Does anyone know of a good way to
rebuild all ports, without dealing with dependency hell?
cd /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade
make
make install
man portupgrade
:-)
Peace,
B
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 11:53:00AM -0500, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 11:10, Brian Szymanski wrote:
> > I'm having some trouble setting the (read-only) sysctl value kern.ngroups.
>
> Raising the maximum number of groups requires changes all over the
> place; even if yo
On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 11:10, Brian Szymanski wrote:
> I'm having some trouble setting the (read-only) sysctl value kern.ngroups.
Raising the maximum number of groups requires changes all over the
place; even if you find them all and rebuild the world (yes, libc
depends on it as well) you'll find t
ern.ngroups="256" in
> /boot/loader.conf.local. When this boots up, I do a manual sysctl
> kern.ngroups, and it tells me 16 still... So I tried throwing the value
> straight in to /boot/defeaults/loader.conf... When I boot up, kern.ngroups
> is still at 16. I even tried ed
efeaults/loader.conf... When I boot up, kern.ngroups
is still at 16. I even tried editing /usr/src/sys/sys/syslimits.h and
setting kern.ngroups to be 256 in the source. However, this results in
some sort of bug in the kernel - when I reboot to a kernel compiled in
this way, my machine dies trying to
