Re: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup

2002-07-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
"Andrew P. Lentvorski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If OpenSSH did a proper "attempt version 2(fail) -> attempt version > 1(succeed)" fallback, your original users *would* be able to get in > *without* change. This fact that this does not occur really is a > bug/misfeature of OpenSSH. No, it's

Re: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup

2002-07-09 Thread Kevin Oberman
> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 10:09:29 -0700 > From: Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Jay Sachs wrote: > > > There are those of us who consider the protocol switch a good change, > > So you are free to do that on your systems. The problem is, whether you > think it's a

Re: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup

2002-07-09 Thread Doug Barton
Jay Sachs wrote: > There are those of us who consider the protocol switch a good change, So you are free to do that on your systems. The problem is, whether you think it's a good idea or not, it's already catching people by surprise, and locking them out of their systems. The change should be re

Re: ssh to remote machines problem after cvsup

2002-07-08 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Some machines will let me in, but only if I enter the password (where I did > not have to before). Others just refuse to let me in at all! I have had the former problem for quite some time. All of the machines in question were running some version of SSH Se