[stable is included]
On Saturday 11 March 2006 19:40, Martin wrote:
>
> The following reply was made to PR threads/80435; it has been noted by
GNATS.
>
> From: Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: threads/80435: panic on high loa
David Xu wrote:
This bug unlikely should be reported on thread@, your code is a fork
bomb, I think it is a warning why recent days the kernel crashed by
such attack, can you reproduce it on 6.0 ?
I just appended it to a similar bug. Sorry.
I don't have access to a machine running 6.0R until to
Martin wrote:
David Xu wrote:
This bug unlikely should be reported on thread@, your code is a fork
bomb, I think it is a warning why recent days the kernel crashed by
such attack, can you reproduce it on 6.0 ?
6.0R seems to work fine with this fork bomb.
Martin
__
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 01:39, Martin wrote:
>
> Martin wrote:
> > David Xu wrote:
> >> This bug unlikely should be reported on thread@, your code is a fork
> >> bomb, I think it is a warning why recent days the kernel crashed by
> >> such attack, can you reproduce it on 6.0 ?
>
> 6.0R seems to
David Xu wrote:
Can anyone add this to 6.1 todo list ? this definitely should be fixed before
6.1R.
One of my friends also has found kern/94278:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=94278
There is no comment on it so far. This crash (without panic)
is not less important, in my opinion.
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 15:27, Martin wrote:
>
> David Xu wrote:
>
> > Can anyone add this to 6.1 todo list ? this definitely should be fixed
before
> > 6.1R.
>
> One of my friends also has found kern/94278:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=94278
>
> There is no comment on it so f