tmpfs is zero bytes (no free space), maybe a zfs bug?

2011-01-19 Thread Attila Nagy
Hi, I first noticed this problem on machines with more memory (32GB eg.), but now it happens on 4G machines too: tmpfs 0B 0B 0B 100% /tmp FreeBSD builder 8.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Jan 8 22:11:54 CET 2011 Maybe it's rel

Re: tmpfs is zero bytes (no free space), maybe a zfs bug?

2011-01-19 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:37:35AM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote: > I first noticed this problem on machines with more memory (32GB > eg.), but now it happens on 4G machines too: > tmpfs 0B 0B 0B > 100%/tmp > FreeBSD builder 8.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-

Re: tmpfs is zero bytes (no free space), maybe a zfs bug?

2011-01-19 Thread Attila Nagy
On 01/19/11 09:46, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:37:35AM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote: I first noticed this problem on machines with more memory (32GB eg.), but now it happens on 4G machines too: tmpfs 0B 0B 0B 100%/tmp FreeBSD

Re: tmpfs is zero bytes (no free space), maybe a zfs bug?

2011-01-19 Thread Ivan Voras
On 19/01/2011 11:09, Attila Nagy wrote: On 01/19/11 09:46, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:37:35AM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote: I first noticed this problem on machines with more memory (32GB eg.), but now it happens on 4G machines too: tmpfs 0B 0B 0B 100% /tmp FreeBSD builder 8.

Re: tmpfs is zero bytes (no free space), maybe a zfs bug?

2011-01-19 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:39:41AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 19/01/2011 11:09, Attila Nagy wrote: > >On 01/19/11 09:46, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > >>On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:37:35AM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote: > >>>I first noticed this problem on machines with more memory (32GB > >>>eg.), but now

Re: tmpfs is zero bytes (no free space), maybe a zfs bug?

2011-01-19 Thread Ivan Voras
On 19 January 2011 16:02, Kostik Belousov wrote: >> http://people.freebsd.org/~ivoras/diffs/tmpfs.h.patch >> >> I don't think this is a complete solution but it's a start. If you can, >> try it and see if it helps. > This is not a start, and actually a step in the wrong direction. > Tmpfs is wron

Re: tmpfs is zero bytes (no free space), maybe a zfs bug?

2011-01-30 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 05:27:38PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 19 January 2011 16:02, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~ivoras/diffs/tmpfs.h.patch > >> > >> I don't think this is a complete solution but it's a start. If you can, > >> try it and see if it helps. > > This i

Re: tmpfs is zero bytes (no free space), maybe a zfs bug?

2011-02-01 Thread Attila Nagy
On 01/30/11 12:09, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 05:27:38PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: On 19 January 2011 16:02, Kostik Belousov wrote: http://people.freebsd.org/~ivoras/diffs/tmpfs.h.patch I don't think this is a complete solution but it's a start. If you can, try it and see

Re: tmpfs is zero bytes (no free space), maybe a zfs bug?

2011-02-07 Thread Gleb Kurtsou
On (19/01/2011 17:27), Ivan Voras wrote: > On 19 January 2011 16:02, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~ivoras/diffs/tmpfs.h.patch > >> > >> I don't think this is a complete solution but it's a start. If you can, > >> try it and see if it helps. > > This is not a start, and

Re: tmpfs is zero bytes (no free space), maybe a zfs bug?

2011-02-07 Thread Ivan Voras
On 7 February 2011 14:37, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: > It's up to user to mount tmpfs filesystems of reasonable size to prevent > resource exhaustion. Anyway, enormously large tmpfs killing all your > process is not the way to go. Of course not, but as I see it (from admin perspective), tmpfs should be

Re: tmpfs is zero bytes (no free space), maybe a zfs bug?

2011-02-07 Thread Gleb Kurtsou
On (07/02/2011 15:35), Ivan Voras wrote: > On 7 February 2011 14:37, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: > > > It's up to user to mount tmpfs filesystems of reasonable size to prevent > > resource exhaustion. Anyway, enormously large tmpfs killing all your > > process is not the way to go. > > Of course not, bu

Re: tmpfs is zero bytes (no free space), maybe a zfs bug?

2011-02-10 Thread Gleb Kurtsou
On (07/02/2011 15:35), Ivan Voras wrote: > On 7 February 2011 14:37, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: > > > It's up to user to mount tmpfs filesystems of reasonable size to prevent > > resource exhaustion. Anyway, enormously large tmpfs killing all your > > process is not the way to go. > > Of course not, bu

Re: tmpfs is zero bytes (no free space), maybe a zfs bug?

2011-02-10 Thread Bruce Cran
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:09:31 +0100 Attila Nagy wrote: > On 01/19/11 09:46, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:37:35AM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote: > >> I first noticed this problem on machines with more memory (32GB > >> eg.), but now it happens on 4G machines too: > >> tmpfs

Re: tmpfs is zero bytes (no free space), maybe a zfs bug?

2011-02-10 Thread Attila Nagy
On 02/10/2011 05:56 PM, Bruce Cran wrote: On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:09:31 +0100 Attila Nagy wrote: On 01/19/11 09:46, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:37:35AM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote: I first noticed this problem on machines with more memory (32GB eg.), but now it happens on

Re: tmpfs is zero bytes (no free space), maybe a zfs bug?

2011-02-11 Thread Gleb Kurtsou
On (10/02/2011 16:56), Bruce Cran wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:09:31 +0100 > Attila Nagy wrote: > > I hope somebody can find the time to look into this, it's pretty > > annoying... > > It's also listed as a bug on OpenSolaris: > http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do;?bug_id=6804