Re: unstable 5.3 boxes

2005-01-13 Thread Mitch Parks
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Doug White wrote: #7 0xe93a0018 in ?? () #8 0xc0580010 in kvprintf (fmt=0xc7b04c60 "?6w?\v6t?\v6t?", func=0x59, arg=0xe93ad9bc, radix=-1067875706, ap=0xc3839674 "\001") at /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_prf.c:643 #9 0xc058940a in selwakeuppri (sip=0x0, pri=0) at /usr/

Re: unstable 5.3 boxes

2005-01-13 Thread Doug White
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Mitch Parks wrote: > It seems both my test and production boxes are not stable with 5.3-Release. > I'm hoping for some insight in how to make at least the production box > not crash. [...] > #7 0xe93a0018 in ?? () > #8 0xc0580010 in kvprintf (fmt=0xc7b04c60 "?6w?\v6t?\v6t?"

Re: unstable 5.3 boxes

2005-01-06 Thread Robert Watson
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 06:29 PM 05/01/2005, Mitch Parks wrote: > >It seems both my test and production boxes are not stable with > >5.3-Release. I'm hoping for some insight in how to make at least the > >production box not crash. > >The crashes have been at different times o

Re: unstable 5.3 boxes

2005-01-05 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 06:29 PM 05/01/2005, Mitch Parks wrote: It seems both my test and production boxes are not stable with 5.3-Release. I'm hoping for some insight in how to make at least the production box not crash. The crashes have been at different times of the day and I've found no suspicious log activity.

unstable 5.3 boxes

2005-01-05 Thread Mitch Parks
It seems both my test and production boxes are not stable with 5.3-Release. I'm hoping for some insight in how to make at least the production box not crash. Production Box: Dell 2600, Dual 2.8 Xeon, 2Gb ram, onboard (amr) RAID. This box was stable running 5.1, 5.2, and 5.2.1, but has crashed/r