M. Warner Losh writes:
>
> Well, this converstation needs to take place on the net@ list. In
> -current, at least, if_ethersubr.c prevents 'ethernet' drivers from
> setting the mtu higher. There's some experimental patches that make
It doesn't prevent anything. It just sets the mtu to a
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Evren Yurtesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Sorry about that but everybody seemed to disagree to having this option of
: 1500+ MTU settings in wi driver.
:
: If you will support this, then its just fine for me. I dont complain! =)
: Sorry!
Well, this c
Sorry about that but everybody seemed to disagree to having this option of
1500+ MTU settings in wi driver.
If you will support this, then its just fine for me. I dont complain! =)
Sorry!
Evren
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Evren Yurte
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Evren Yurtesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: I think something is called broken when it doesnt work as you expect it to
: work or it doesnt comply with standards.
: Also I think something is called an 'extra feature' if it is not in the
: standard which d
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Evren Yurtesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Yes, actually this is why I asked first about MTU settings in wi. I use
: PPPoE and it has 8bytes overhead. It could be nice to set MTU to 1508 so
: 1500 byte ethernet frames can be encapsualted in PPPoE withou
I think something is called broken when it doesnt work as you expect it to
work or it doesnt comply with standards.
Also I think something is called an 'extra feature' if it is not in the
standard which defines it but you have access to it.
Can you please show me the 802.11b document where it says
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003 21:28:35 +0200 (WET) Evren Yurtesen wrote:
> Isnt it also the responsibility of the person who sets the MTU that he
> should be sure everything will work right? in my access points setting MTU
> to higher than 1500 works for example. I am using linux based access
> points.
For
ig hilsen / Best regards
>
> Sten Daniel Sørsdal
> Wireless Manager
> WAN Norway AS
> ---
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wright, Michaelx L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 3. januar 2003 19:28
> To: Evren Yurtesen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc
n Yurtesen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Michael Sierchio; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: wi0 and mtu setting [bad idea]
Good Afternoon All,
I am curious to know if you are taking into account MTU limitations imposed by
link-partners i.e. switches, hubs, routers an
