On 2011/11/19 at 19:24, Alexander Best wrote:
>
> hi there,
> just stumbled upon this little detail:
>
> 1) have "/" mounted read-only
> 2) 'make buildkernel'
> 3) 'make installkernel && echo "success"'
>-> this will fail
> 4) 'mount -uw /'
> 5) 'make installkernel && echo "success"'
>-
On Sun Nov 20 11, Denise H. G. wrote:
>
> On 2011/11/19 at 19:24, Alexander Best wrote:
> >
> > hi there,
> > just stumbled upon this little detail:
> >
> > 1) have "/" mounted read-only
> > 2) 'make buildkernel'
> > 3) 'make installkernel && echo "success"'
> >-> this will fail
> > 4) 'mou
On Sun Nov 20 11, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Sun Nov 20 11, Denise H. G. wrote:
> >
> > On 2011/11/19 at 19:24, Alexander Best wrote:
> > >
> > > hi there,
> > > just stumbled upon this little detail:
> > >
> > > 1) have "/" mounted read-only
> > > 2) 'make buildkernel'
> > > 3) 'make installke
On Sat Nov 19 11, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2011-11-18 15:37, Alexander Best wrote:
> > what are the reasons for using -fstack-protector instead of
> > -fstack-protector-all in sys/conf/kern.mk?
>
> My guess would be one or more of the following:
>
> - The price in performance is too high
> - Th
