On 28 August 2014 10:34, Ed Schouten wrote:
> On 28 August 2014 19:18, Steve Kargl
> wrote:
>> What it is the performance penalty (time and memory)? That is,
>> buildworld already takes a long time on my system because
>> of clang.
>
> My gut feeling is that impact is minimal. Buildworl
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 07:02:55PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
>
> small number of patches to build with this flag, I am also going to
> add -Wthread-safety to WARNS=6, to make sure it won't regress. I'm
> also planning on MFC'ing at least the changes to , so it
> is at least possible to write porta
On 28 August 2014 19:18, Steve Kargl wrote:
> What it is the performance penalty (time and memory)? That is,
> buildworld already takes a long time on my system because
> of clang.
My gut feeling is that impact is minimal. Buildworlds seem to take
approximately the same time, mainly beca
written a patch that adds #defines for the attributes that are
relevant for us (read: things that are useful for C programs) to
and patched up all functions in libpthread and
libstdthreads to use these attributes where possible:
http://80386.nl/pub/20140828-lock_annotate.txt
One of my observations
