https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223752
Alex S changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwt...@gmail.com
--- Comment #22 from Ale
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223752
--- Comment #21 from David Chisnall ---
It's also worth noting that functions declared with this attribute can have
some complex interaction with threading. If a process spawns a thread which
calls `dlopen` then all of the library's constr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223752
Dimitry Andric changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223752
--- Comment #19 from Mark Millard ---
(In reply to dstaesse from comment #18)
You are welcome.
My guess is that this is outside POSIX completely and
is just ABI material for what you are doing.
In fact, looking around I found an ARM docu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223752
--- Comment #18 from dstaesse ---
Yes, but at least it's not undefined behaviour. Thanks again for your help!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebs
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223752
--- Comment #17 from Mark Millard ---
(In reply to dstaesse from comment #16)
You may be limited to amd64 and i386
for FreeBSD: it does not appear that
the other ABIs have .init_array and
.fini_array support.
It sounds like 223752 can be
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223752
--- Comment #16 from dstaesse ---
Your comments make a lot of sense. I updated the library code to call the
functions in the .init_array and .fini_array, and it looks like this works for
our testcases.
This is probably the answer I was loo
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223752
--- Comment #15 from dstaesse ---
Created attachment 188130
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=188130&action=edit
updated library code
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223752
--- Comment #14 from Mark Millard ---
(In reply to Mark Millard from comment #13)
Beyond my "form" vs "from" typo and "erguments"
vs. "arguments" typo, I probably also should
have put the word "called" in quotes: the
__attribute__ ((constr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223752
--- Comment #13 from Mark Millard ---
(In reply to dstaesse from comment #10)
The materials that you have referenced
indicate that __attribute__ ((constructor))
gets no arguments. Details follow.
>From the materials you referenced:
QUOTE
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223752
--- Comment #12 from dstaesse ---
(In reply to Mark Millard from comment #11)
Interesting.
Doesn't the list of func_ptrs have the arguments here as well?
/usr/src/lib/csu/common/ignore_init.c:extern void (*__init_array_start[])(int,
char
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223752
--- Comment #11 from Mark Millard ---
(In reply to dstaesse from comment #8)
(In reply to dstaesse from comment #8)
I took a quick grep for -r325700 (head):
# grep -r __init_array_start /usr/src/* | more
/usr/src/contrib/llvm/tools/lld/E
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223752
--- Comment #10 from dstaesse ---
(In reply to Mark Millard from comment #9)
Thanks a lot for taking time to help me out. I'm definitely no expert on this
matter. Our target is restricted to POSIX.
I've found mostly posts on stackoverflow
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223752
--- Comment #9 from Mark Millard ---
(In reply to dstaesse from comment #7)
I did not manage to find anything that mentioned
the parameters/arguments: You found materials that
I did not. What context(s) were they from?
"portable way": wha
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223752
--- Comment #8 from dstaesse ---
I agree that the documentation could be more specific about the nature of the
functions that can have this attribute.
It's true that most examples use functions without arguments but that could
just be beca
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223752
--- Comment #7 from dstaesse ---
(In reply to Mark Millard from comment #5)
Good point, we only tried amd64 and i386.
This feature seems to be very sparsely documented, with some sources saying
everything but void func(void) is undefined
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223752
--- Comment #6 from Mark Millard ---
(In reply to dstaesse from comment #4)
Also: in looking around I find that every
official webpage/document about this that
shows examples shows functions with no
arguments. (But none that I found has an
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223752
Mark Millard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@dsl-only.net
--- Comment #5
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223752
--- Comment #4 from dstaesse ---
Are you 100% sure about that? Doesn't this attribute work with functions that
have a signature that is allowable for a main() function? I haven't heard any
compiler complain, and we tried combinations of GNU
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223752
David Chisnall changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thera...@freebsd.org
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223752
Conrad Meyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.o
21 matches
Mail list logo
