Re: 11.0 -r300944 build attempted WITH_META_MODE failed [amd64 targeting powerpc64 via devel/powerpc64-gcc use]

2016-05-30 Thread Matteo Riondato
> On May 30, 2016, at 11:29 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > > I should have mentioned that to enable META_MODE after not having it on > you should do a 'make cleanworld' first. This should probably be mentioned in src.conf(5) then. Best, Matteo signature.asc Description: Message signed with Open

Re: 11.0 -r300944 build attempted WITH_META_MODE failed [amd64 targeting powerpc64 via devel/powerpc64-gcc use]

2016-05-30 Thread Mark Millard
On 2016-May-30, at 8:29 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > This failure is not likely related to META_MODE. > > I should have mentioned that to enable META_MODE after not having it on > you should do a 'make cleanworld' first. > > On 5/29/2016 9:19 PM, Mark Millard wrote: >> This was my first-time-ever

Re: 11.0 -r300944 build attempted WITH_META_MODE failed [amd64 targeting powerpc64 via devel/powerpc64-gcc use]

2016-05-30 Thread Bryan Drewery
This failure is not likely related to META_MODE. I should have mentioned that to enable META_MODE after not having it on you should do a 'make cleanworld' first. On 5/29/2016 9:19 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > This was my first-time-ever WITH_META_MODE attempt. I show a chunk of the log > later belo

11.0 -r300944 build attempted WITH_META_MODE failed [amd64 targeting powerpc64 via devel/powerpc64-gcc use]

2016-05-29 Thread Mark Millard
This was my first-time-ever WITH_META_MODE attempt. I show a chunk of the log later below. Retrying without WITH_META_MODE=yes resulted in no problems, unlike below. A self-hosted powerpc64 11.0 -r300944 build using devel/powerpc64-gcc as the so-called "cross compiler" also did not have this pr