https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192320
Tijl Coosemans t...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192320
Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@freebsd.org,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192320
--- Comment #2 from David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org ---
I did write a __cxa_thread_atexit a while ago, but I haven't yet committed it
(I'll try to find it). I didn't commit it because the semantics of
_Thread_local are very poorly
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192303
Tijl Coosemans t...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490
yaneurab...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.o
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490
Garrett Cooper n...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@freebsd.org,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490
Warner Losh i...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs Triage|Issue Resolved
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490
Warner Losh i...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Issue Resolved |Needs MFC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490
Garrett Cooper n...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h...@sendmail.cz
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490
Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs MFC |Issue Resolved
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490
Garrett Cooper n...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Issue Resolved |In Discussion
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490
Garrett Cooper n...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|i...@freebsd.org |i...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490
--- Comment #11 from Warner Losh i...@freebsd.org ---
P.S. If you want to paper over it in a different way, you could add a '-' after
the @ in the rm -rf ${CANONICALOBJDIR} line. That would cause errors to just be
ignored.
--
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192320
--- Comment #3 from Steve Wills swi...@freebsd.org ---
(In reply to David Chisnall from comment #2)
Any status update on this? I've run into this issue too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192320
--- Comment #5 from Tijl Coosemans t...@freebsd.org ---
(In reply to David Chisnall from comment #4)
That's what glibc seems to do. When a thread calls dlclose its thread_local
variables are destroyed, but if there are other threads with
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490
Garrett Cooper,425-314-3911 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192320
Rudolf-Walter Kiss-Szakacs changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202914
--- Comment #2 from duckbre...@yahoo.com ---
(In reply to Dimitry Andric from comment #1)
I resolved this issue by running make delete-old
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202914
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|standards |kern
--
You
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202914
Raphael Kubo da Costa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.o
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202914
--- Comment #1 from Dimitry Andric ---
This message:
"fatal error: file
'/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmmipscodegen/../../../contrib/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Compiler.h'
modified since it was first processed"
seems to
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202914
Dimitry Andric changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |Not A Bug
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203064
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192320
Hannes Hauswedell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205453
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205453
Dimitry Andric changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205453
--- Comment #3 from Mark Millard ---
As for where _Static_assert and static_assert are gotten from:
_Static_assert in C11 and static_assert in C++11 exist even for free-standing
implementations. As I understand it is
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192320
Mikhail Teterin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
Raphael Kubo da Costa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
--- Comment #9 from Raphael Kubo da Costa ---
I agree, but this is legacy software (version 3 doesn't even have its own array
implementation anymore as far as I can see) that won't be changed upstream.
My question is
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
--- Comment #8 from Dimitry Andric ---
I think the program should not try to use both "using namespace std", and then
use a reserved C++11 name. It should either drop the "using namespace std", or
rename its own array to
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
--- Comment #10 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Raphael Kubo da Costa from comment #9)
I think it is not doing the right thing. Have a look at this[1]. std::array is
a feature introduced in C++11 and the software is not
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
--- Comment #16 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com ---
Comment on attachment 167391
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=167391
Enclose array in a namespace
I added two new poudriere logs for {9.3,10.2}amd64. I can
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
--- Comment #18 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Raphael Kubo da Costa from comment #17)
Yes, please. And thanks to come up with the patch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #167090|0 |1
is
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
Raphael Kubo da Costa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #167391|maintainer-approval?(fernan
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
--- Comment #19 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: rakuco
Date: Thu Feb 25 22:21:38 UTC 2016
New revision: 409563
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/409563
Log:
Add patches to fix the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
Raphael Kubo da Costa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
Raphael Kubo da Costa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
--- Comment #25 from David Chisnall ---
Works for me:
$ clang++ -c foo.cc
$ clang++ -v
FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) 20140512
Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.2
Thread model: posix
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
--- Comment #28 from David Chisnall ---
Ah, I see. It would have helped if your reduced test case had used #include
instead of #include .
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
--- Comment #27 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to David Chisnall from comment #25)
In 10.2 and below OpenVSP compiles without these modifications. It is in
11-CURRENT where it started to fail when we landed the new
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
--- Comment #26 from Raphael Kubo da Costa ---
Well, that's FreeBSD 10.2, where the port was already working. The problem only
happens in HEAD after a newer libc++ was imported.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
David Chisnall changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207253
--- Comment #22 from Raphael Kubo da Costa ---
(In reply to David Chisnall from comment #21)
> This patch looks more complicated than it needs to be. Wouldn't inserting:
>
> using ::array;
>
> Immediately after the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207837
--- Comment #4 from Jan Beich ---
(In reply to Vikash Badal from comment #0)
> c++: note: diagnostic msg: Error generating preprocessed source(s).
This probably means we have to shave
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207837
Jan Beich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|www/firefox: clang34 and|www/firefox:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207837
--- Comment #10 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: jbeich
Date: Sun Mar 13 15:17:03 UTC 2016
New revision: 410995
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/410995
Log:
MFH: r410973
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207837
--- Comment #14 from Jan Beich ---
(In reply to Dimitry Andric from comment #13)
OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS is enabled by default. It doesn't pass just -O3 but also
--enable-optimize which lets vendor decide whether to pass
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207837
--- Comment #16 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: dim
Date: Sun Mar 13 18:32:18 UTC 2016
New revision: 296801
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/296801
Log:
Pull in r219512 from upstream
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207837
--- Comment #12 from Dimitry Andric ---
Strangely, I tried building www/firefox on stable/10, from before r410973 was
applied, and it builds just fine for me, even the problematic
Unified_cpp_protocol_websocket0.cpp file.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207837
--- Comment #9 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: jbeich
Date: Sun Mar 13 14:42:59 UTC 2016
New revision: 410973
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/410973
Log:
www/firefox: work around
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207837
Jan Beich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207837
--- Comment #2 from Vikash Badal ---
no sure how to obtain this info
lldb37 c++.core
(lldb) bt
error: invalid process
please advise
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207837
Jan Beich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbe...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207837
--- Comment #7 from Vikash Badal ---
(In reply to Jan Beich from comment #3)
I tried adding OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS=on to the make.conf for the poudriere jail
---Begin make.conf---
MACHINE=i386
MACHINE_ARCH=i386
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205453
Dimitry Andric changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Closed
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209413
Sylvain Garrigues changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211864
Baptiste Daroussin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193594
Vladimir Krstulja changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193594
Ed Schouten changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211864
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-qa
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211864
--- Comment #3 from Michel Depeige ---
Quick follow : I'm trying to rebuild the world with the patch applied, but the
box is overheating. I'm trying to sort that out before winter :)
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216707
Bug ID: 216707
Summary: exp-run: Update lang/gcc from GCC 4.9 to GCC 5
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216707
--- Comment #22 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
(In reply to commit-hook from comment #21)
> New revision: 433484
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/433484
>
> Log:
> lang/gprolog: pass -O3 to unbreak with gcc5
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216707
--- Comment #21 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: jbeich
Date: Mon Feb 6 10:55:32 UTC 2017
New revision: 433484
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/433484
Log:
lang/gprolog: pass -O3 to
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216707
--- Comment #24 from Jan Beich (mail not working) ---
(In reply to Gerald Pfeifer from comment #22)
> Usually I would have expected this to be fixed with a _lower_ optimization
> level (so -O1),
Both -O1 and -O3 fix
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216707
--- Comment #14 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: jbeich
Date: Sun Feb 5 07:52:23 UTC 2017
New revision: 433381
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/433381
Log:
graphics/bugle: unbreak
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216707
Jan Beich (mail not working) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216707
--- Comment #13 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: jbeich
Date: Sun Feb 5 07:18:56 UTC 2017
New revision: 433376
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/433376
Log:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216707
Bug 216707 depends on bug 216810, which changed state.
Bug 216810 Summary: devel/tigcc: fails to build with gcc5 or later
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216810
What|Removed |Added
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216707
--- Comment #12 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: jbeich
Date: Sun Feb 5 04:36:23 UTC 2017
New revision: 433350
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/433350
Log:
sysutils/shim: unbreak
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216707
Jan Beich (mail not working) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216707
--- Comment #7 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: jbeich
Date: Sun Feb 5 03:30:08 UTC 2017
New revision: 433342
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/433342
Log:
lang/gcl: use clang and
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216707
Jan Beich (mail not working) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216707
--- Comment #10 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: jbeich
Date: Sun Feb 5 03:30:33 UTC 2017
New revision: 433345
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/433345
Log:
emulators/raine: partially
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216707
--- Comment #9 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: jbeich
Date: Sun Feb 5 03:30:25 UTC 2017
New revision: 433344
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/433344
Log:
games/wizznic: use clang
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216878
Bug ID: 216878
Summary: BSD readelf -d output is slightly incompatible with
GNU readelf
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216878
Jan Beich (mail not working) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216878
Jan Beich (mail not working) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.o
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216707
--- Comment #26 from Antoine Brodin ---
New failures on 11.0 amd64:
+ {"origin"=>"devel/hs-ncurses", "pkgname"=>"hs-ncurses-0.2.15",
"phase"=>"build", "errortype"=>"???"}
+ {"origin"=>"lang/yap",
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216878
--- Comment #1 from Ed Maste ---
Added ELF Tool Chain ticket:
https://sourceforge.net/p/elftoolchain/tickets/544/
Note that elfutils eu-readelf does not include parentheses:
% eu-readelf -d /bin/ls
Dynamic segment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216878
--- Comment #2 from Baptiste Daroussin ---
Note that this was already raised in the past and the result of the discussion
was this won't change iirc and we adapted the readelf consumers in base and the
ports framework for
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216878
--- Comment #3 from Ed Maste ---
(In reply to Baptiste Daroussin from comment #2)
Do you have a link to that discussion? I recall that we had it, but can't find
it now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216707
6year...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||6year...@gmail.com
---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216908
--- Comment #3 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: emaste
Date: Wed Feb 8 20:31:54 UTC 2017
New revision: 313458
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/313458
Log:
lld: Allow arbitrary code
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216707
John Marino changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216903
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216707
--- Comment #15 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: jbeich
Date: Sun Feb 5 12:34:06 UTC 2017
New revision: 433397
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/433397
Log:
lang/hugs: unbreak with
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216707
--- Comment #18 from Pedro F. Giffuni ---
(In reply to Jan Beich (mail not working) from comment #17)
> Hmm, not much bustage thanks to DragonFly dogfooding GCC 5 before us.
:).
> (In reply to Pedro F. Giffuni from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216707
--- Comment #23 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
(In reply to Jan Beich (mail not working) from comment #17)
> Why not GCC 7?
GCC 7 is still in development and its first release (GCC 7.1) is still
a few months out.
> exp-runs
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216908
Tijl Coosemans changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|t...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216080
--- Comment #5 from Ed Schouten ---
So to get this straight: this no longer breaks, right? It was caused by a
change to libc++, but that change has been reverted. If so, shall I mark this
bug as WONTFIX?
--
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216080
--- Comment #6 from Jan Beich (mail not working) ---
DragonFly, architectures on external toolchain and users that prefer GCC may be
affected after upgrading GCC to 6.x or later. For some reason Clang (even 4.0)
is
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216908
--- Comment #2 from Ed Maste ---
(In reply to Dimitry Andric from comment #1)
> I wasn't aware that lld was used by default for aarch64, I thought this used
> an external binutils port based ld instead?
buildworld and
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216707
--- Comment #5 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: jbeich
Date: Sat Feb 4 04:16:59 UTC 2017
New revision: 433278
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/433278
Log:
net-mgmt/flow-tools:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216707
--- Comment #1 from Antoine Brodin ---
Update of LANG_GCC_IS is missing?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216707
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #179503|0 |1
is
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216451
--- Comment #4 from otacilio.n...@bsd.com.br ---
(In reply to otacilio.neto from comment #3)
Sorry, this patch do not reproduce the error. I'm creating a new one.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216451
otacilio.n...@bsd.com.br changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #179298|0 |1
is obsolete|
1 - 100 of 2078 matches
Mail list logo