[Bug 221423] gcc std::locale(LocaleName) crashes instead of throwing an exception

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221423 --- Comment #6 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #5) >(In reply to Mark Millard from comment #3) >> mix of system and gcc libraries than gcc5 > >Tier1 and some Tier2 archs don't have system GCC

[Bug 221367] i386 sanitizer runtimes not installed during amd64 32-bit compat in make installworld

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221367 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org

[Bug 221543] [toolchain] FreeBSD HEAD with LLD_BOOTSTRAP and WITHOUT_LLD_IS_LD

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221543 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org

[Bug 221423] gcc std::locale(LocaleName) crashes instead of throwing an exception

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221423 --- Comment #7 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #6) Dumb typo. Wrong: See bugzilla 221423. Should have been: See bugzilla 221288 . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Bug 221288] lang/gcc5 links against libsupc++ when compiling

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221288 --- Comment #11 from Mark Millard --- Trying my standard-C++ program that uses C++ threads in a more modern context (head -r322287, lang/gcc7) in an amd64 context under a Virtual Box virtual machine (that is running on

[Bug 221423] gcc std::locale(LocaleName) crashes instead of throwing an exception

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221423 --- Comment #9 from Mark Millard --- Here are lang/gcc7 and system clang compile/link results as viewed by ldd (all under head -r322287 in a Virtual Box virtual machine): things look good until I try my threading

[Bug 221367] i386 sanitizer runtimes not installed during amd64 32-bit compat in make installworld

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221367 --- Comment #3 from Ed Maste --- > Okay, but won't that also cause 32-bit versions of libllvm, libclang and clang > itself to be built? We definitely don't want that. :) Good point - I compared the result of 'make

[Bug 221543] [toolchain] FreeBSD HEAD with LLD_BOOTSTRAP and WITHOUT_LLD_IS_LD

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221543 Ed Maste changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |In Progress

[Bug 221423] gcc std::locale(LocaleName) crashes instead of throwing an exception

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221423 Gerald Pfeifer changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|maintainer-feedback?(gerald |

[Bug 221423] gcc std::locale(LocaleName) crashes instead of throwing an exception

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221423 --- Comment #4 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #3) You can use ldd on the a,out after each type of link to see the different bindings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Bug 221423] gcc std::locale(LocaleName) crashes instead of throwing an exception

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221423 Mark Millard changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 219289] security/clambc: fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219289 Gerald Pfeifer changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|219275 | Referenced

[Bug 220590] math/fftw3: fails to build on armv6 (729 ports skipped)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220590 --- Comment #9 from mikael.uran...@gmail.com --- or you can use (untested) CFLAGS_armv6= -fno-builtin-sincos -fno-builtin-sin -fno-builtin-cos \ -fno-builtin-sincosf -fno-builtin-sinf -fno-builtin-cosf \

[Bug 220590] math/fftw3: fails to build on armv6 (729 ports skipped)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220590 --- Comment #7 from mikael.uran...@gmail.com --- The 11 branch is missing this commit which solved the problem on 12: base r319047 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 220590] math/fftw3: fails to build on armv6 (729 ports skipped)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220590 --- Comment #8 from Jason E. Hale --- (In reply to mikael.urankar from comment #7) Ok, I'll change it to check for less than 1200032, then. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug 220590] math/fftw3: fails to build on armv6 (729 ports skipped)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220590 Jason E. Hale changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|maintainer-feedback?(jhale@

[Bug 220590] math/fftw3: fails to build on armv6 (729 ports skipped)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220590 --- Comment #6 from Jason E. Hale --- Created attachment 184300 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=184300=edit Disable unsafe-math-optimizations on armv6 This patch should disable

[Bug 220591] graphics/graphviz: fails to build on armv6 (451 ports skipped)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220591 --- Comment #7 from mikael.uran...@gmail.com --- The CFLAGS must be set globally (in make.conf), a lot of multimedia and graphics ports are affected by this issue (on 11.0 and 11.1 at least), 12-CURRENT is not affected. I don't think it's

[Bug 220591] graphics/graphviz: fails to build on armv6 (451 ports skipped)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220591 Dirk Meyer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |In Progress ---

[Bug 220590] math/fftw3: fails to build on armv6 (729 ports skipped)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220590 --- Comment #2 from Jan Beich --- Err, -ffast-math is a group of flags. The issue is caused by -funsafe-math-optimizations. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 220590] math/fftw3: fails to build on armv6 (729 ports skipped)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220590 --- Comment #1 from Jan Beich --- Affected FreeBSD versions: 11.0 (clang 3.8), 11.1 (clang 4.0), 12.0 (clang500-import). Workarounds: define USE_GCC=yes or drop -ffast-math. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 220590] math/fftw3: fails to build on armv6 (729 ports skipped)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220590 --- Comment #3 from Jan Beich --- Here's a test case: $ cat a.c #include #include int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { printf("%Lf\n", cosl(5)); printf("%Lf\n", sinl(5)); return 0; } $ cc a.c -lm -O1

[Bug 220590] math/fftw3: fails to build on armv6 (729 ports skipped)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220590 Jan Beich changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Bug 220591] graphics/graphviz: fails to build on armv6 (451 ports skipped)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220591 Bug ID: 220591 Summary: graphics/graphviz: fails to build on armv6 (451 ports skipped) Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS:

[Bug 220590] math/fftw3: fails to build on armv6 (729 ports skipped)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220590 Bug ID: 220590 Summary: math/fftw3: fails to build on armv6 (729 ports skipped) Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any

[Bug 220591] graphics/graphviz: fails to build on armv6 (451 ports skipped)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220591 --- Comment #6 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: dinoex Date: Tue Jul 11 08:28:44 UTC 2017 New revision: 445473 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/445473 Log: - fix build on armv6 PR:

[Bug 220591] graphics/graphviz: fails to build on armv6 (451 ports skipped)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220591 Dirk Meyer changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|maintainer-feedback?(dinoex

[Bug 220591] graphics/graphviz: fails to build on armv6 (451 ports skipped)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220591 --- Comment #3 from Jan Beich --- Comment on attachment 184219 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=184219 patch-lib-common-shapes.c Doesn't help: $ make checking for sincos... no [...]

[Bug 218808] www/firefox: usr/bin/ld: error: unknown argument: --warn-unresolved-symbols

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218808 Jan Beich changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||214864

[Bug 220591] graphics/graphviz: fails to build on armv6 (451 ports skipped)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220591 mikael.uran...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael.uran...@gmail.com

[Bug 220591] graphics/graphviz: fails to build on armv6 (451 ports skipped)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220591 --- Comment #5 from mikael.uran...@gmail.com --- We build package for 11.0 on armv6 now? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug 220590] math/fftw3: fails to build on armv6 (729 ports skipped)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220590 mikael.uran...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael.uran...@gmail.com

[Bug 220590] math/fftw3: fails to build on armv6 (729 ports skipped)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220590 --- Comment #5 from Jan Beich --- (In reply to mikael.urankar from comment #4) > Are you sure 12 is affected? Ah, you're right! When writing comment 1 I've only checked whether sincos is emitted but not if libm

[Bug 219484] cad/openvsp: fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later on 10.*

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219484 Jan Beich changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|

maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 219484] cad/openvsp: fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later on 10.*

Jan Beich has asked freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.org for maintainer-feedback: Bug 219484: cad/openvsp: fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later on 10.* https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219484 --- Comment #2 from Jan Beich --- (In reply to

[Bug 219484] cad/openvsp: fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later on 10.*

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219484 Dimitry Andric changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 219484] cad/openvsp: fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later on 10.3

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219484 Jan Beich changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|cad/openvsp: fails to build |cad/openvsp: fails

[Bug 219484] cad/openvsp: fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later on 10.*

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219484 --- Comment #6 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: dim Date: Wed Jul 19 18:22:32 UTC 2017 New revision: 321222 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/321222 Log: Pull in r229281 from upstream

[Bug 219484] cad/openvsp: fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later on 10.*

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219484 --- Comment #4 from Gerald Pfeifer --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #2) > Alternatives are locking the ports to USE_GCC < 6 (if gerald is OK) > or laying on BROKEN_FreeBSD_10 deathbed. I prefer the latter,

[Bug 219484] cad/openvsp: fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later on 10.3

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219484 --- Comment #8 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #7) Thanks for testing. I wonder, how ofter are snapshots of -STABLE created? I couldn't find any new enough to test the port with poudriere:

[Bug 220883] clang crash: Assertion failed: (Result.isUninit() && "temporary created multiple times"), function createTemporary

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220883 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org

[Bug 220883] clang crash: Assertion failed: (Result.isUninit() && "temporary created multiple times"), function createTemporary

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220883 Dimitry Andric changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.o

[Bug 218808] www/firefox: usr/bin/ld: error: unknown argument: --warn-unresolved-symbols

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218808 --- Comment #6 from Jan Beich --- lld 5.0 per base r321369 does support --warn-unresolved-symbols, so comment 1 shows the following: /usr/bin/ld.lld: warning: undefined symbol: environ >>> referenced by a.c >>>

[Bug 219484] cad/openvsp: fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later on 10.3

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219484 --- Comment #12 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #11) Having a look at the error log, it seems the missing operator is used in libc++ itself (~basic_stringbug()). With GCC < 6, the compiler

[Bug 219484] cad/openvsp: fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later on 10.3

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219484 Gerald Pfeifer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Closed

[Bug 219484] cad/openvsp: fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later on 10.3

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219484 --- Comment #9 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com --- Does this PR need additional action on my side in order to be closed? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

Problem reports for freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.org that need special attention

To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and

[Bug 219484] cad/openvsp: fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later on 10.3

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219484 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |---

[Bug 219484] cad/openvsp: Fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later on 10.3 (< 11.0)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219484 Bug 219484 depends on bug 220951, which changed state. Bug 220951 Summary: cad/openvsp: Update to 3.13.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220951 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 218808] www/firefox: usr/bin/ld: error: unknown argument: --warn-unresolved-symbols (WITH_LLD_IS_LD)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218808 O. Hartmann changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|www/firefox: usr/bin/ld:|www/firefox:

[Bug 219484] cad/openvsp: Fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later on 10.3 (< 11.0)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219484 fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||220951 Referenced

[Bug 218808] www/firefox: usr/bin/ld: error: unknown argument: --warn-unresolved-symbols

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218808 --- Comment #7 from O. Hartmann --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #6) I "solved" those problems for now by not usinf LLD as LD for the time being it is still harmful. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 219484] cad/openvsp: fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later on 10.*

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219484 --- Comment #5 from Dimitry Andric --- I'll merge libc++ r229281 into stable/10 later today, at least it'll appear in 10.4-RELEASE then. Jan, is it worth bumping __FreeBSD_version for this? -- You are receiving this

[Bug 218808] www/firefox: usr/bin/ld: error: unknown argument: --warn-unresolved-symbols

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218808 --- Comment #3 from O. Hartmann --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #2) Is there a solution? www/firefox doesn't build on 12-CURRENT (recent, as of today) anymore if WITH_LLD_IS_LD is enabled. poudriere also

[Bug 214971] clang + lld 3.9.1: Unhandled relocation 1031

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214971 Ed Maste changed: What|Removed |Added Status|In Progress |Closed

[Bug 217648] [lld 4.0.0] WITH_LLD_IS_LD Results

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217648 Ed Maste changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ema...@freebsd.org

[Bug 218861] libelf elf_update fails when adding sections

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218861 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch -- You

[Bug 218860] libelf doesn't reload section headers after update with ELF_C_WRITE

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218860 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch -- You

[Bug 219484] cad/openvsp: Fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later on 10.3 (< 11.0)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219484 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|merge-quarterly-

[Bug 219484] cad/openvsp: Fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later on 10.3 (< 11.0)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219484 --- Comment #20 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: rakuco Date: Fri Jul 28 21:45:45 UTC 2017 New revision: 446855 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/446855 Log: Explicitly build with

[Bug 219484] cad/openvsp: Fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later on 10.3 (< 11.0)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219484 fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #184778|0 |1 is

[Bug 219484] cad/openvsp: Fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later on 10.3 (< 11.0)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219484 Raphael Kubo da Costa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Open|Closed

[Bug 221288] lang/gcc5 links against libsupc++ when compiling

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221288 --- Comment #9 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #6) Returning to a g++6 based a.out back trace for the C++ threading to show some infrastructure usage involved: Thread 12 received signal

[Bug 219484] cad/openvsp: Fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later on 10.3 (< 11.0)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219484 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |---

[Bug 220590] math/fftw3: fails to build on armv6 (729 ports skipped)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220590 Jan Beich changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Bug 220591] graphics/graphviz: fails to build on armv6 (451 ports skipped)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220591 Jan Beich changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Bug 221288] lang/gcc5 links against libsupc++ when compiling

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221288 --- Comment #5 from Mark Millard --- I suspect this mix of infrastructures ties in to why standard c++ threading fails under the likes of g++6 compiles while the code works when compiled and linked via system clang++

[Bug 221288] lang/gcc5 links against libsupc++ when compiling

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221288 --- Comment #6 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #5) To avoid confusion from a typing/editing error. . . "Note #3 -> #4 goes from" in the reference to the g++6 based a.out backtrace should

[Bug 221288] lang/gcc5 links against libsupc++ when compiling

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221288 --- Comment #7 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #5) FYI: An older report of the threading issues with the tiny program: static void f() {} int main(int, const char* []) { auto a0{

[Bug 221288] lang/gcc5 links against libsupc++ when compiling

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221288 --- Comment #8 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #7) Looking at its details bugzilla 212330 is not a good example for here in 221288. For one the failing context was armv6 and amd64 worked.

[Bug 219484] cad/openvsp: Fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later on 10.3 (< 11.0)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219484 --- Comment #16 from fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com --- Comment on attachment 184778 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=184778 patch to the ports tree Is this patch acceptable? -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 219484] cad/openvsp: Fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later on 10.3 (< 11.0)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219484 fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #184778|

[Bug 221733] SSE2 instructions emited in compiler-rt on AMD Sempron 3000+

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221733 Ed Maste changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ema...@freebsd.org

[Bug 221733] SSE2 instructions emited in compiler-rt on AMD Sempron 3000+

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221733 Ed Maste changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Open -- You are

[Bug 221588] clang crashes when compiling cad/openvsp

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221588 Conrad Meyer changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org

[Bug 221588] clang crashes when compiling cad/openvsp

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221588 --- Comment #2 from Dimitry Andric --- So what this test case causes is: fatal error: error in backend: No open frame This happens with most versions of clang that I could test, and is due to the following inline

[Bug 219289] security/clambc: fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219289 Bug ID: 219289 Summary: security/clambc: fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any

[Bug 219153] head, stable/11, release/11.0.1: libkvm (& more?) not updated to handle powerpc/powerpc64 ET_DYN based vmcore.* 's and such

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219153 --- Comment #14 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to John Baldwin from comment #8) With the following hacks I've been able to get an output for the debug.minidump=0 based vmcore.2 (2 GiBYte RAM dumped) for powerpc

[Bug 216080] science/bddsolve: fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216080 Jan Beich changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|219275 | Referenced

[Bug 219289] security/clambc: fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219289 --- Comment #2 from Gerald Pfeifer --- Should we then just deprecate and remove this port? It appears we've got way too much old cruft in the tree... :-( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 219289] security/clambc: fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219289 --- Comment #3 from Dimitry Andric --- Certainly, for a security product, it is a little strange they have not updated their backend libraries for 6 years. I would not trust this, in any case. :) -- You are receiving

[Bug 219153] head, stable/11, release/11.0.1: libkvm (& more?) not updated to handle powerpc/powerpc64 ET_DYN based vmcore.* 's and such

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219153 --- Comment #8 from John Baldwin --- Can you pop up to frame 13 (solib_svr4_r_map) and 'p *info' and 'p *lmo'? The lack of working exceptions from clang (which appears to be the source of the coredump in gdb itself)

[Bug 219153] head, stable/11, release/11.0.1: libkvm (& more?) not updated to handle powerpc/powerpc64 ET_DYN based vmcore.* 's and such

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219153 --- Comment #10 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to John Baldwin from comment #8) The bt that I included shows libstdc++ in use inside /usr/local/bin/gdb, not libc++ . This is because /usr/local/bin/gdb was built under

[Bug 219153] head, stable/11, release/11.0.1: libkvm (& more?) not updated to handle powerpc/powerpc64 ET_DYN based vmcore.* 's and such

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219153 --- Comment #9 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to John Baldwin from comment #5) As for ps -M /var/crash/vmcore.7 listing no processes: main uses kvm_getprocs, which in turn eventually does:

[Bug 219153] head, stable/11, release/11.0.1: libkvm (& more?) not updated to handle powerpc/powerpc64 ET_DYN based vmcore.* 's and such

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219153 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org

[Bug 219153] head, stable/11, release/11.0.1: libkvm (& more?) not updated to handle powerpc/powerpc64 ET_DYN based vmcore.* 's and such

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219153 --- Comment #6 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to John Baldwin from comment #5) I've used both gdb's as well but I've had more occasions when system's gdb worked and ports did not than the other way around (when there

[Bug 219153] head, stable/11, release/11.0.1: libkvm (& more?) not updated to handle powerpc/powerpc64 ET_DYN based vmcore.* 's and such

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219153 --- Comment #5 from John Baldwin --- I would start with trying to debug why 'ps -M' doesn't work by stepping through 'ps'. In terms of gdb7 vs gdb6, I definitely used gdb7 on userland binaries with threads, fork

[Bug 219153] head, stable/11, release/11.0.1: libkvm (& more?) not updated to handle powerpc/powerpc64 ET_DYN based vmcore.* 's and such

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219153 --- Comment #2 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to John Baldwin from comment #1) The ps -M result for using: # svnlite diff /usr/src/lib Index: /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm_private.c

[Bug 219153] head, stable/11, release/11.0.1: libkvm (& more?) not updated to handle powerpc/powerpc64 ET_DYN based vmcore.* 's and such

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219153 John Baldwin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@freebsd.org

[Bug 219153] head, stable/11, release/11.0.1: libkvm (& more?) not updated to handle powerpc/powerpc64 ET_DYN based vmcore.* 's and such

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219153 --- Comment #12 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #11) So trying: ps -M /var/crash/vmcore.2 -N /usr/lib/debug/boot/kernel/kernel.debug for a vmcore.2 based on: debug.minidump=0 things do

[Bug 219153] head, stable/11, release/11.0.1: libkvm (& more?) not updated to handle powerpc/powerpc64 ET_DYN based vmcore.* 's and such

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219153 --- Comment #13 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #12) I found the "Raw core file not supported" logic in /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm_powerpc.c : static int

[Bug 219153] head, stable/11, release/11.0.1: libkvm (& more?) not updated to handle powerpc/powerpc64 ET_DYN based vmcore.* 's and such

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219153 --- Comment #11 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #9) [This note is limited to contexts with gcc 4.2.1 based kernels.] Summary after avoiding a user error: looks like there is a default of

[Bug 219153] head, stable/11, release/11.0.1: libkvm (& more?) not updated to handle powerpc/powerpc64 ET_DYN based vmcore.* 's and such

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219153 --- Comment #3 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #2) An FYI based on my ET_DYN test hack in libkvm: I've gotten some more panics with the libkvm change in place. This makes the new

[Bug 219153] head, stable/11, release/11.0.1: libkvm (& more?) not updated to handle powerpc/powerpc64 ET_DYN based vmcore.* 's and such

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219153 --- Comment #4 from Mark Millard --- A not as libkvm tied note about which gdb works better for 32-bit powerpc in at least some contexts: I took an a.out (from clang++ targeting powerpc) and tried /usr/local/bin/gdb

[Bug 219153] head, stable/11, release/11.0.1: libkvm (& more?) not updated to handle powerpc/powerpc64 ET_DYN based vmcore.* 's and such

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219153 --- Comment #7 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to John Baldwin from comment #5) This note is for the /usr/local/bin/gdb crash. As for building ports with debug information, I use as a default context: # svnlite diff

[Bug 220184] clang 4.0.0 segfaults on buildworld

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220184 O. Hartmann changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 220184] clang 4.0.0 segfaults on buildworld

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220184 --- Comment #10 from Conrad Meyer --- If overheating of the CPU is causing segfaults (non-overclocked), your CPU is already damaged. Some stress test like Prime95 or IntelBurnTest should also reproduce the issue. --

[Bug 220184] clang 4.0.0 segfaults on buildworld

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220184 --- Comment #11 from Chris Collins --- Have now tested on an old laptop (slow hardware so long waiting time) It has the exact same symptons. Stable when building 11.0 or 10.3 on older clang. Once on

[Bug 220184] clang 4.0.0 segfaults on buildworld

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220184 --- Comment #12 from Chris Collins --- (In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #10) it has no issue with prime95 stress tests and other stress tests. So to confirm absolutely 100% stable in every software on

[Bug 220184] clang 4.0.0 segfaults on buildworld

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220184 --- Comment #17 from Chris Collins --- Perhaps buildworld with clang 4.0 is now the ultimate hardware stability test :) 3rd compile was fine, now running 4th. Will still test on the server class hardware this

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >