Re: [CFR] add usb_sleepout.[ch]

2010-11-01 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Monday 01 November 2010 03:03:48 Weongyo Jeong wrote: On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 03:09:49PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On Sunday 31 October 2010 01:19:01 Weongyo Jeong wrote: Hello USB guys, 1) All the sleepout_xxx() functions need mutex asserts. Hi, It looks it don't need

Re: [CFR 2-3/n] removes uther dependency of axe(4)

2010-11-01 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Sunday 31 October 2010 23:43:04 Weongyo Jeong wrote: +static void +axe_watchdog(void *arg) +{ + struct axe_softc *sc = arg; + struct ifnet *ifp = sc-sc_ifp; + + if ((ifp-if_drv_flags IFF_DRV_RUNNING) == 0) + return; + Hi, Please explain what is wrong

Re: usb/151851: libusb(3) libusb_control_transfer() return value is incorrect

2010-11-01 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Monday 01 November 2010 02:18:58 HIROSHI OOTA wrote: Number: 151851 Category: usb Synopsis: libusb(3) libusb_control_transfer() return value is incorrect Confidential: no Severity: non-critical Priority: low Responsible:freebsd-usb State:

Re: usb/151851: libusb(3) libusb_control_transfer() return value is incorrect

2010-11-01 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
The following reply was made to PR usb/151851; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Cc: HIROSHI OOTA xal...@gmail.com, freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb/151851: libusb(3) libusb_control_transfer() return value is

Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org

2010-11-01 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker

usb/151862: adding support of USB GSM modem Falcom Twist

2010-11-01 Thread Alessandro de Manzano
Number: 151862 Category: usb Synopsis: adding support of USB GSM modem Falcom Twist Confidential: no Severity: non-critical Priority: high Responsible:freebsd-usb State: open Quarter: Keywords: Date-Required: Class:

Re: serious issue caused by usb device, stalling almost all operations

2010-11-01 Thread Alexander Best
On Mon Oct 25 10, Alexander Motin wrote: Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On Wednesday 20 October 2010 17:30:40 Alexander Best wrote: hi there, i'm running HEAD (r213495; amd64). i stumbled upon this severe problem: after attaching my mobile phone, it simply resets without doing mount or

Re: [CFR 2-3/n] removes uther dependency of axe(4)

2010-11-01 Thread Weongyo Jeong
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:30:25AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On Sunday 31 October 2010 23:43:04 Weongyo Jeong wrote: +static void +axe_watchdog(void *arg) +{ + struct axe_softc *sc = arg; + struct ifnet *ifp = sc-sc_ifp; + + if ((ifp-if_drv_flags

Re: [CFR] add usb_sleepout.[ch]

2010-11-01 Thread Weongyo Jeong
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:10:43AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On Monday 01 November 2010 03:03:48 Weongyo Jeong wrote: On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 03:09:49PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On Sunday 31 October 2010 01:19:01 Weongyo Jeong wrote: Hello USB guys, 1) All the

[RFC] Outline of USB process integration in the kernel taskqueue system

2010-11-01 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
Hi! I've wrapped up an outline patch for what needs to be done to integrate the USB process framework into the kernel taskqueue system in a more direct way that to wrap it. The limitation of the existing taskqueue system is that it only guarantees execution at a given priority level. USB

Re: [CFR 2-3/n] removes uther dependency of axe(4)

2010-11-01 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Monday 01 November 2010 19:51:22 Weongyo Jeong wrote: On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:30:25AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On Sunday 31 October 2010 23:43:04 Weongyo Jeong wrote: Hi, Please explain what is wrong with the existing code regarding code synchronisation. Your patch is

Re: [RFC] Outline of USB process integration in the kernel taskqueue system

2010-11-01 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Monday 01 November 2010 21:07:29 Matthew Fleming wrote: On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote: Hi! I've wrapped up an outline patch for what needs to be done to integrate the USB process framework into the kernel taskqueue system in a more

Re: [RFC] Outline of USB process integration in the kernel taskqueue system

2010-11-01 Thread Matthew Fleming
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote: Hi! I've wrapped up an outline patch for what needs to be done to integrate the USB process framework into the kernel taskqueue system in a more direct way that to wrap it. The limitation of the existing taskqueue

Re: [RFC] Outline of USB process integration in the kernel taskqueue system

2010-11-01 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, November 01, 2010 3:54:59 pm Hans Petter Selasky wrote: Hi! I've wrapped up an outline patch for what needs to be done to integrate the USB process framework into the kernel taskqueue system in a more direct way that to wrap it. The limitation of the existing taskqueue system

USB camera not detected by 8.1, was working in 7

2010-11-01 Thread Alexander Churanov
Hi folks! My USB camera is not detected by FreeBSD 8.1. In 7.1 it was working flawlessly. In my case even no /dev/da* device is created. Google does not provide answers, since people mainly discuss inability to work with /dev/da* which is absent on my system. In 7.1 the da device and slice da0s1