Re: i386/147475: [install] FreeBSD 8.x does not install on ASUS K8N4-E Mainboard

2010-11-14 Thread brucec
Synopsis: [install] FreeBSD 8.x does not install on ASUS K8N4-E Mainboard State-Changed-From-To: feedback-open State-Changed-By: brucec State-Changed-When: Sun Nov 14 20:01:20 UTC 2010 State-Changed-Why: This looks like it might be a problem with probing USB. From the screenshot Werner sent:

Re: i386/147475: [install] FreeBSD 8.x does not install on ASUS K8N4-E Mainboard

2010-11-14 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Sunday 14 November 2010 21:10:22 bru...@freebsd.org wrote: Synopsis: [install] FreeBSD 8.x does not install on ASUS K8N4-E Mainboard State-Changed-From-To: feedback-open State-Changed-By: brucec State-Changed-When: Sun Nov 14 20:01:20 UTC 2010 State-Changed-Why: This looks like it might

LOR: USB config SX lock vs. USB suspend and resume SX lock

2010-11-14 Thread Bruce Cran
I'm running -CURRENT on a laptop which has a wireless switch. When I boot with it enabled and then switch it off, the following LOR gets logged: lock order reversal: 1st 0xff000466d070 USB config SX lock (USB config SX lock) @ /usr/src/head/sys/dev/usb/usb_device.c:2671 2nd

Re: LOR: USB config SX lock vs. USB suspend and resume SX lock

2010-11-14 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Sunday 14 November 2010 22:19:46 Bruce Cran wrote: I'm running -CURRENT on a laptop which has a wireless switch. When I boot with it enabled and then switch it off, the following LOR gets logged: Can you verify that this LOR is real, and that it is not due to SX-locks having similar names?

USB controller error logged when resuming after suspend

2010-11-14 Thread Bruce Cran
I've been trying to get my laptop working with suspend/resume. It comes back, but USB seems rather unhappy about something for a while. Despite this, plugging a flash drive in does attach to the EHCI controller at usbus6. uhci2: wake_prep disabled wake for \\_SB_.PCI0.USB1 (S3) uhci3: wake_prep

Re: LOR: USB config SX lock vs. USB suspend and resume SX lock

2010-11-14 Thread Bruce Cran
On Sunday 14 November 2010 21:28:02 Hans Petter Selasky wrote: Can you verify that this LOR is real, and that it is not due to SX-locks having similar names? I'm not sure how to do that, but show alllocks in ddb returns: Process 14 (usb) thread 0xff0005402450 (100051) exclusive sleep

Re: usb/138548: [usb67] [usb8] usb devices periodically have unknown activity

2010-11-14 Thread arundel
Synopsis: [usb67] [usb8] usb devices periodically have unknown activity State-Changed-From-To: open-feedback State-Changed-By: arundel State-Changed-When: Sun Nov 14 23:45:48 UTC 2010 State-Changed-Why: I'm sorry to put this back into feedback state, but Alexander Yerenkow has not answered an