Re: FreeBSD 8.2 and DisplayLink devices?

2011-07-11 Thread Chris Rees
On 11 July 2011 04:22, Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au wrote: On 11/07/2011, at 7:59, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 20:13:17 +0200 Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote: CFLAGS='-I/usr/local/include' CPPFLAGS='-I/usr/local/include' LDFLAGS='-L/usr/local/lib '  

Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org

2011-07-11 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker

Re: FreeBSD 8.2 and DisplayLink devices?

2011-07-11 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 11/07/2011, at 17:35, Chris Rees wrote: It would be nice if FreeBSD shipped with those files in (say) /usr/libdata/pkgconfig and the pkg-config port was tweaked to search there as well but it hasn't happened yet.. Really? We don't have pkgconfig in the base system, so I'd submit that

Re: FreeBSD 8.2 and DisplayLink devices?

2011-07-11 Thread Chris Rees
On 11 Jul 2011 14:26, Daniel Oapos;Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au wrote: On 11/07/2011, at 17:35, Chris Rees wrote: It would be nice if FreeBSD shipped with those files in (say) /usr/libdata/pkgconfig and the pkg-config port was tweaked to search there as well but it hasn't happened yet..

Re: FreeBSD 8.2 and DisplayLink devices?

2011-07-11 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 05:52:46 +0200 Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote: So, look into the log file config.log to understand what it is missing; Good advice! Here is a part of it: configure:13177: gcc -o conftest -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib conftest.c -lusb 5

Re: FreeBSD 8.2 and DisplayLink devices?

2011-07-11 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 12/07/2011, at 24:06, Chris Rees wrote: That is the other approach but it's a bit of a pain to make the libusb port do something very different for 8.x. The last thing we should have is a port that does different things depending on OS version like that, I was thinking of a virtual