On Monday 01 November 2010 03:03:48 Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 03:09:49PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Sunday 31 October 2010 01:19:01 Weongyo Jeong wrote:
Hello USB guys,
1) All the sleepout_xxx() functions need mutex asserts.
Hi,
It looks it don't need
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:10:43AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Monday 01 November 2010 03:03:48 Weongyo Jeong wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 03:09:49PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Sunday 31 October 2010 01:19:01 Weongyo Jeong wrote:
Hello USB guys,
1) All the
On Sunday 31 October 2010 01:19:01 Weongyo Jeong wrote:
Hello USB guys,
The following patch is to add a implementation, called `sleepout'.
Please reviews. I'd like to commit it into HEAD if no objections.
Adds `sleepout' prototype which is a comic combination of callout(9) and
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 03:09:49PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Sunday 31 October 2010 01:19:01 Weongyo Jeong wrote:
Hello USB guys,
The following patch is to add a implementation, called `sleepout'.
Please reviews. I'd like to commit it into HEAD if no objections.
Adds
Hello USB guys,
The following patch is to add a implementation, called `sleepout'.
Please reviews. I'd like to commit it into HEAD if no objections.
Adds `sleepout' prototype which is a comic combination of callout(9) and
taskqueue(8) only for USB drivers to implement one step timer. In
On 31 October 2010 12:19, Weongyo Jeong weongyo.je...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello USB guys,
The following patch is to add a implementation, called `sleepout'.
Please reviews. I'd like to commit it into HEAD if no objections.
Adds `sleepout' prototype which is a comic combination of callout(9)