On Saturday 06 December 2008, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Dec 6, 2008, at 4:34 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
After various feedback from several people I have made a new patch
proposal
that will fix the busdma problem.
See:
http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=154181
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 01:34:54PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
After various feedback from several people I have made a new patch proposal
that will fix the busdma problem.
See:
http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=154181
Review wanted!
I don't know how to patch the
Hi,
After various feedback from several people I have made a new patch proposal
that will fix the busdma problem.
See:
http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=154181
Review wanted!
I don't know how to patch the psyco interface for SUN. Maybe there is nothing
that needs to be patched?
--HPS
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hans Petter Selasky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Hi,
:
: It turns out my initial patch need to be limited to the use-case only. Before
: I start any real work, I want to know if anyone will object if I implement
: the following new BUS_DMA flag into
Hi,
It turns out my initial patch need to be limited to the use-case only. Before
I start any real work, I want to know if anyone will object if I implement
the following new BUS_DMA flag into FreeBSD's busdma system?
amd64/amd64/busdma_machdep.c
i386/i386/busdma_machdep.c
On Nov 16, 2008, at 5:08 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
It turns out my initial patch need to be limited to the use-case
only. Before
I start any real work, I want to know if anyone will object if I
implement
the following new BUS_DMA flag into FreeBSD's busdma system?
