Re: 31st address line sometimes not used on EHCI/UHCI/OHCI

2007-06-13 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Tuesday 12 June 2007 19:29, Julian Elischer wrote: > Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > On Monday 28 May 2007 09:59, Julian Elischer wrote: > >> I'd rather it were a screwed up MB than a screwed up chip :-) > > > > Ok. Here are the PCI ID's: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:11:0:class=0x0c0310 card

Re: 31st address line sometimes not used on EHCI/UHCI/OHCI

2007-06-12 Thread Julian Elischer
Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On Monday 28 May 2007 09:59, Julian Elischer wrote: I'd rather it were a screwed up MB than a screwed up chip :-) Ok. Here are the PCI ID's: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:11:0:class=0x0c0310 card=0x818a1043 chip=0x003b10de rev=0xa1 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'NVIDIA

Re: 31st address line sometimes not used on EHCI/UHCI/OHCI

2007-06-11 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Monday 28 May 2007 09:59, Julian Elischer wrote: > John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > Hans Petter Selasky wrote this message on Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:53 +0200: > >> On Sunday 27 May 2007 23:53, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > >>> Hans Petter Selasky wrote this message on Sun, May 27, 2007 at 22:35 +0200:

Re: 31st address line sometimes not used on EHCI/UHCI/OHCI

2007-05-28 Thread Julian Elischer
John-Mark Gurney wrote: Hans Petter Selasky wrote this message on Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:53 +0200: On Sunday 27 May 2007 23:53, John-Mark Gurney wrote: Hans Petter Selasky wrote this message on Sun, May 27, 2007 at 22:35 +0200: I've got some reports back that some USB host controllers do not

Re: 31st address line sometimes not used on EHCI/UHCI/OHCI

2007-05-28 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Hans Petter Selasky wrote this message on Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:53 +0200: > On Sunday 27 May 2007 23:53, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > Hans Petter Selasky wrote this message on Sun, May 27, 2007 at 22:35 +0200: > > > I've got some reports back that some USB host controllers do not support > > > tra

Re: 31st address line sometimes not used on EHCI/UHCI/OHCI

2007-05-28 Thread Julian Elischer
Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On Sunday 27 May 2007 23:53, John-Mark Gurney wrote: Hans Petter Selasky wrote this message on Sun, May 27, 2007 at 22:35 +0200: I've got some reports back that some USB host controllers do not support transferring memory from a location higher than 2GB. What should

Re: 31st address line sometimes not used on EHCI/UHCI/OHCI

2007-05-28 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Monday 28 May 2007 09:01, Julian Elischer wrote: > Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > On Sunday 27 May 2007 23:53, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > >> Hans Petter Selasky wrote this message on Sun, May 27, 2007 at 22:35 +0200: > >>> I've got some reports back that some USB host controllers do not > >>> su

Re: 31st address line sometimes not used on EHCI/UHCI/OHCI

2007-05-27 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Sunday 27 May 2007 23:53, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Hans Petter Selasky wrote this message on Sun, May 27, 2007 at 22:35 +0200: > > I've got some reports back that some USB host controllers do not support > > transferring memory from a location higher than 2GB. > > > > What should we do about th

Re: 31st address line sometimes not used on EHCI/UHCI/OHCI

2007-05-27 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Sunday 27 May 2007 22:54, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hans Petter Selasky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : I've got some reports back that some USB host controllers do not support > : transferring memory from a location higher than 2GB. > : > : What sho

Re: 31st address line sometimes not used on EHCI/UHCI/OHCI

2007-05-27 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Hans Petter Selasky wrote this message on Sun, May 27, 2007 at 22:35 +0200: > I've got some reports back that some USB host controllers do not support > transferring memory from a location higher than 2GB. > > What should we do about this? > > Should we limit all USB DMA allocations to the lower

Re: 31st address line sometimes not used on EHCI/UHCI/OHCI

2007-05-27 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hans Petter Selasky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I've got some reports back that some USB host controllers do not support : transferring memory from a location higher than 2GB. : : What should we do about this? : : Should we limit all USB DMA allocati

31st address line sometimes not used on EHCI/UHCI/OHCI

2007-05-27 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
Hi, I've got some reports back that some USB host controllers do not support transferring memory from a location higher than 2GB. What should we do about this? Should we limit all USB DMA allocations to the lower 2GB of the memory? --HPS ___ freebsd-