I have a number of Soekris 4826 boards with USB thumb drives attached
that happily run FreeBSD 6.0. However, when I try to get them to run
FreeBSD 7, the thumb drives stop working. A PR was recently filed by
someone with a similar issue: kern/122380 (I see the same failure as in
the PR). Looks like
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Geoffrey Mainland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: I have a number of Soekris 4826 boards with USB thumb drives attached
: that happily run FreeBSD 6.0. However, when I try to get them to run
: FreeBSD 7, the thumb drives stop working. A PR was recently file
Wow, this turns out to be much worse than I thought...I've tracked down
the problem to the commit of the new physical memory allocator at Sat
Jun 16 04:57:05 2007 UTC. Before that, no kern/122380; after that,
kern/122380 applies. Any ideas where to go from here?
Thanks,
Geoff
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008
On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
> Wow, this turns out to be much worse than I thought...I've tracked down
> the problem to the commit of the new physical memory allocator at Sat
> Jun 16 04:57:05 2007 UTC. Before that, no kern/122380; after that,
> kern/122380 applies. Any ideas
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 07:31:59PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
> > Wow, this turns out to be much worse than I thought...I've tracked down
> > the problem to the commit of the new physical memory allocator at Sat
> > Jun 16 04:57:05 2007 UT
On Thursday 24 April 2008, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 07:31:59PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
> > > Wow, this turns out to be much worse than I thought...I've tracked down
> > > the problem to the commit of the new
On Thursday 24 April 2008 03:16:38 am Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Thursday 24 April 2008, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 07:31:59PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
> > > > Wow, this turns out to be much worse than
On Thursday 24 April 2008, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> This would indicate a bug in the bus_dmamap_load() call (wrong length?) and
> that is going to hose you when you do the bus_dmamap_sync() for systems
> with bounce pages (not enough data will get copied back and forth?). You
> need to track down t
On Thursday 24 April 2008 11:38:09 am Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Thursday 24 April 2008, John Baldwin wrote:
> >
> > This would indicate a bug in the bus_dmamap_load() call (wrong length?)
and
> > that is going to hose you when you do the bus_dmamap_sync() for systems
> > with bounce pages (n
