>Number: 110988
>Category: usb
>Synopsis: [patch] Handling of quirk IGNORE_RESIDUE is umass.c is broken
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible:freebsd-usb
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>C
The following reply was made to PR usb/110988; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: usb/110988: [patch] Handling of quirk IGNORE_RESIDUE is
umass.c is broken
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:53:07 +0200
PR number changed... see below
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Thursday 29 March 2007 02:17, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>>> Number: 110989
>>> Category: usb
>>> Synopsis: [patch] Handling of quirk IGNORE_RESIDUE is umass.c is
>>> broken Confidential: no
>>> Severity: serious
Hi,
is there any way to get this into the source tree?
Michael Gmelin wrote:
>> Number: 110988
>> Category: usb
>> Synopsis: [patch] Handling of quirk IGNORE_RESIDUE is umass.c is broken
>> Confidential: no
>> Severity: serious
>> Priority: medium
>> Responsible:
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 16:09, grem wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there any way to get this into the source tree?
Yes, I can take this patch into the P4 tree if you change it a little bit.
I want this invalid residue detection to be all automatic:
If the first residue you get is invalid, then it should
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 April 2007 16:09, grem wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> is there any way to get this into the source tree?
>
> Yes, I can take this patch into the P4 tree if you change it a little bit.
>
> I want this invalid residue detection to be all automatic:
>
> If the firs
On Friday 06 April 2007 16:56, grem wrote:
> Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 April 2007 16:09, grem wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> is there any way to get this into the source tree?
> >
> > Yes, I can take this patch into the P4 tree if you change it a little
> > bit.
> >
> > I want this
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Friday 06 April 2007 16:56, grem wrote:
>> Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 04 April 2007 16:09, grem wrote:
Hi,
is there any way to get this into the source tree?
>>> Yes, I can take this patch into the P4 tree if you change it a little
>>>
On Thursday 19 April 2007 02:54, grem wrote:
> Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > On Friday 06 April 2007 16:56, grem wrote:
> >> Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday 04 April 2007 16:09, grem wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there any way to get this into the source tree?
> >>>
> >>> Yes, I
