Re: [Xen-devel] FreeBSD PVHVM call for testing

2013-05-28 Thread Matt Wilson
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 06:15:00PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On 24/05/13 12:11, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > > > Thanks for the test, this is what I expected. I'm a little bit out of > > ideas since I'm not able to reproduce this on upstream Xen 4.2. Without > > knowing what's happening inside

Re: FreeBSD PVHVM call for testing

2013-05-28 Thread Outback Dingo
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Outback Dingo wrote: > >> >> I wrote a blog post specifically for installing 10-CURRENT from a >>> snapshot ISO and getting bootstrapped >>> from there, to help the Google Summer of Code Student that

Re: FreeBSD PVHVM call for testing

2013-05-28 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Outback Dingo wrote: > > I wrote a blog post specifically for installing 10-CURRENT from a snapshot >> ISO and getting bootstrapped >> from there, to help the Google Summer of Code Student that I am mentoring. >> What specifically do you want to be backported to 9-

Re: FreeBSD PVHVM call for testing

2013-05-28 Thread Outback Dingo
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Outback Dingo wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Craig Rodrigues >> wrote: >> >>> I wrote this blog post: >>> >>> >>> http://blogs.freebsdish.org/rodrigc/2013/05/24/setting-up-a-vm-

Re: FreeBSD PVHVM call for testing

2013-05-28 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Outback Dingo wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Craig Rodrigues > wrote: > >> I wrote this blog post: >> >> >> http://blogs.freebsdish.org/rodrigc/2013/05/24/setting-up-a-vm-for-doing-gsoc-work/ >> >> for the steps how to do it. You can follow those

Re: [Xen-devel] FreeBSD PVHVM call for testing

2013-05-28 Thread Colin Percival
On 05/28/13 12:18, Matt Wilson wrote: > VCPUOP_set_singleshot_timer returns -EINVAL when: > > 1) the specified vCPU ID is out of range (<0 or >MAX_VIRT_CPUS) > 2) the specified vCPU ID doesn't match the running vCPU. > > It seems that there is a confusion between the logical vCPU ID and the > loc

Re: [Xen-devel] FreeBSD PVHVM call for testing

2013-05-28 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 03:21:54PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk < > konrad.w...@oracle.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 07:41:50PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I've pushed a new branch, pvhvm_v10 that cont

Re: FreeBSD PVHVM call for testing

2013-05-28 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On 24/05/13 12:11, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On 23/05/13 21:09, Colin Percival wrote: >> On 05/23/13 02:06, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >>> On 22/05/13 22:03, Colin Percival wrote: Testing on a cr1.8xlarge EC2 instance, I get Xen 4.2, but it ends up with a panic -- console output below. I can

Re: FreeBSD PVHVM call for testing

2013-05-28 Thread Outback Dingo
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Roger Pau Monné >wrote: > > > On 23/05/13 15:20, Jeroen van der Ham wrote: > > > > > > On 13 May 2013, at 20:32, Roger Pau Monné > wrote: > > >> Also, I've created a wiki page that explains how to set up a

Re: virtio-net vs qemu 1.5.0

2013-05-28 Thread Bryan Venteicher
- Original Message - > Thx! Do you plan to merge the multiqueue branch? > Hopefully within 1-2 months. > Julian > > > ___ > freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization >

Re: virtio-net vs qemu 1.5.0

2013-05-28 Thread Julian Stecklina
On 05/28/2013 05:51 AM, Bryan Venteicher wrote: > I committed a fix to this in the multiqueue driver [1] during BSDCan, > haven't merged it back into HEAD yet. I'll do that in a couple of days. Thx! Do you plan to merge the multiqueue branch? Julian

Re: Virtualbox: time sync

2013-05-28 Thread Kai Gallasch
Am 26.05.2013 um 07:03 schrieb Marc Fournier: > > First, thank you for the answer about switching from straight bridge to using > a tap device … that made a *huge* difference … I'm not able to actually run a > build world within the environment without having the whole machine lock up … Hi Marc